Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 17:13:804039.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.804039. eCollection 2022.

Color Doppler Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Subclavian Artery Stenosis

Affiliations

Color Doppler Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Subclavian Artery Stenosis

Jie Zhang et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: It is of great significance to evaluate symptomatic subclavian artery (SA) stenosis by color Doppler ultrasonography. More than 50% SA stenosis may induce symptoms. Currently, there is a paucity of published literature and lack of practitioner consensus for how ultrasonic findings should be interpreted in patients with SA stenosis.

Objective: The study aimed to prospectively evaluate SA stenosis using color Doppler ultrasonography, with digital subtraction angiography as a reference. Moreover, we aimed to determine the optimal thresholds to predict SA stenosis (≥50%).

Methods: A total of 423 SAs from 234 patients with normal or stenotic lumen were enrolled. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) and acceleration time at the stenotic and distal segments of the SA, peak reversed velocity of the vertebral artery, and waveforms of the stenotic SA, distal SA, and vertebral artery were recorded. The ratios of stenotic PSV to distal PSV (PSVr) and distal AT to stenotic AT were also calculated. The optimal cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: All ultrasonic parameters were significantly correlated with the degree of SA stenosis, whereas PSV (r = 0.624, P < 0.001), PSVr (r = 0.654, P < 0.001) and VA waveform change (r = 0.631, P < 0.001) had the strongest correlation with SA stenosis. The optimal cutoff values were as follows: PSV ≥ 230 cm/s and PSVr ≥ 2.2 to predict ≥ 50% stenosis, and PSV ≥ 340 cm/s and PSVr ≥ 3.0 to predict ≥ 70% stenosis.

Conclusions: Symptomatic patients with the ultrasonic parameters of PSV ≥ 230 cm/s and PSVr ≥ 2.2 need to be considered for further verification by computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, or by digital subtraction angiography with a view to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent implantation in the same session. The recommended graded cutoff values can help in long-term management of patients with SA stenosis.

Keywords: color Doppler ultrasonography; digital subtraction angiography; subclavian artery stenosis; subclavian steal syndrome; vertebrobasilar insufficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study inclusion/exclusion criteria. SA, subclavian artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Method for measuring and recording ultrasonic parameters of subclavian artery (A,C) and vertebral artery (B,D).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves of various hemodynamic parameters for the evaluation of ≥50%(A) and ≥70%(B) stenosis of the subclavian artery. PSV, peak systolic velocity; PSVr, the ratio of peak systolic velocity at the stenotic segment to that at the distal segment; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve, CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Saha T, Naqvi SY, Ayah OA, McCormick D, Goldberg S. Subclavian artery disease: diagnosis and therapy. Am J Med. (2017) 130:409–16. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdul Jabbar A, Houston J, Burket M, Il'Giovine ZJ, Srivastava BK, Agarwal A. Screening for subclinical subclavian artery stenosis before coronary artery bypass grafting: should we do it? Echocardiography. (2017) 34:928–33. 10.1111/echo.13528 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shadman R, Criqui MH, Bundens WP, Fronek A, Denenberg JO, Gamst AC, et al. . Subclavian artery stenosis: prevalence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2004) 44:618–23. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Potter BJ, Pinto DS. Subclavian steal syndrome. Circulation. (2014) 129:2320–3. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006653 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Labropoulos N, Nandivada P, Bekelis K. Prevalence and impact of the subclavian steal syndrome. Ann Surg. (2010) 252:166–70. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3375a - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources