Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 2:14:17588359221083052.
doi: 10.1177/17588359221083052. eCollection 2022.

Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: rationale for neoadjuvant therapy and pivotal clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: rationale for neoadjuvant therapy and pivotal clinical trials

Russell G Witt et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

The treatment of malignant melanoma has drastically changed over the past decade with the advent of immune checkpoint blockade, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibition, and other novel therapies such as oncolytic virus intralesional therapy. Despite improvements in patient response rates and survival with these new treatments, there exists a large portion of patients with surgically resectable disease that are high risk for relapse. Patients with high-risk resectable melanoma account for up to 20% of newly diagnosed cases. For this high-risk group of patients, neoadjuvant therapy has many purposed advantages over adjuvant therapy, including a more robust immune response due to abundant tumor antigens at treatment initiation, the ability to assess pathologic response to therapy, tumor downstaging leading to increased disease resectability, and a potential decreased need for extensive lymphadenectomies. These findings have been backed by preclinical models and multiple neoadjuvant trials are underway. In this review, we will discuss the trials that have set the foundation for the current treatment standards and discuss the role and rationale for neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanomas.

Keywords: BRAF/MEK inhibition; immune checkpoint blockade; malignant melanoma; neoadjuvant therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Dr Wargo is an inventor on a US patent application (PCT/US17/53.717) relevant to the current work; reports compensation for speaker’s bureau and honoraria from Imedex, Dava Oncology, Omniprex, Illumina, Gilead, PeerView, MedImmune, and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); serves as a consultant/advisory board member for Roche/Genentech, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, BMS, Merck, Biothera Pharmaceuticals, and Micronoma. Dr. Erstad and Dr. Witt have no disclosures to report. There are no financial relationships related to the design or execution of this manuscript.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 7–33. - PubMed
    1. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Melanoma staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition and beyond. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25: 2105–2110. - PubMed
    1. Kirkwood JM, Strawderman MH, Ernstoff MS, et al. Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 7–17. - PubMed
    1. Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. How much of a good thing? What duration for interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy? J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3773–3776. - PubMed
    1. Hersh EM, Del Vecchio M, Brown MP, et al. A randomized, controlled phase III trial of nab-Paclitaxel versus dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 2267–2274. - PMC - PubMed