Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer
- PMID: 35251404
- PMCID: PMC8886472
- DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.112678
Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, single plus one-port robotic surgery (SPORS) was introduced to overcome the limitations of single-port laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of various diseases.
Aim: To compare the clinical and cosmetic outcomes of SPORS with those of multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS), which is presently the standard surgical treatment for colon cancer.
Material and methods: The study included 36 patients who underwent SPORS and 61 patients who underwent MPLS for left-sided colon cancer between August 2014 and January 2016. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) was used to assess cosmetic outcomes.
Results: SPORS involved a longer median operative time than MPLS (232 vs. 155 min, p = 0.009). There were no apparent differences in the time before diet tolerance, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and postoperative complication rate. However, SPORS patients had a shorter total incision length (5.0 vs. 8.0 cm, p < 0.001). The median proximal and distal resection margins and the median number of harvested lymph nodes were comparable between the two groups. The PSAQ favored the SPORS approach, revealing significant differences in appearance (15 vs. 18, p < 0.001), consciousness (9 vs. 11, p < 0.001), satisfaction with appearance (14 vs. 17, p < 0.001), satisfaction with symptoms (9 vs. 10, p = 0.022), and overall score (47 vs. 55, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The clinicopathologic outcomes of SPORS were comparable but its cosmetic outcomes were superior to those of MPLS for left-sided colon cancer.
Keywords: colonic neoplasm; laparoscopy; natural orifice endoscopic surgery; robotic surgical procedure; treatment outcome.
Copyright: © 2021 Fundacja Videochirurgii.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Jung KU, Yun SH, Cho YB, et al. Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:403–7. - PubMed
-
- Nam SH, Paek J, Choi C, et al. A comparison between reduced-port robotic surgery and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy for myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;213:53–7. - PubMed
-
- Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC. Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:249–54. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources