Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 16:12:755430.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.755430. eCollection 2022.

Complete and Incomplete Resection for Progressive Glioblastoma Prolongs Post-Progression Survival

Affiliations

Complete and Incomplete Resection for Progressive Glioblastoma Prolongs Post-Progression Survival

Felix Behling et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: The role of resection in progressive glioblastoma (GBM) to prolong survival is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine 1) the predictors of post-progression survival (PPS) in progressive GBM and 2) which subgroups of patients would benefit from recurrent resection.

Methods: We have conducted a retrospective bicentric cohort study on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type GBM treated in our hospitals between 2006 and 2015. Kaplan-Maier analyses and univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to identify predictors and their influence on PPS.

Results: Of 589 patients with progressive IDH wild-type GBM, 355 patients were included in analyses. Median PPS of all patients was 9 months (95% CI 8.0-10.0), with complete resection 12 months (95% CI 9.7-14.3, n=81), incomplete resection 11 months (95% CI 8.9-13.1, n=70) and without resection 7 months (95% CI 06-08, n=204). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated a benefit for PPS with complete (HR 0.67, CI 0.49-0.90) and incomplete resection (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51-1.04) and confirmed methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter, lower age at diagnosis, absence of deep brain and multilocular localization, higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and recurrent therapies to be associated with longer PPS. In contrast, traditional eloquence and duration of progression-free survival had no effect on PPS. Subgroup analyses showed that all subgroups of confirmed predictors benefited from resection, except for patients in poor condition with a KPS <70.

Conclusions: Out data suggest a role for complete and incomplete recurrent resection in progressive GBM patients regardless of methylation of MGMT, age, or adjuvant therapy but not in patients with a poor clinical condition with a KPS <70.

Keywords: extent of resection; post progression survival; progressive glioblastoma; re-surgery; recurrent surgery; resectability; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. Flow diagram of patients with progressive. IDH-Wildtype glioblastoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post-progression survival by extent of resection. Panel (A) shows post-progression survival in Kaplan-Meier estimates for patients stratified by complete, incomplete, and no resection. In panel (B) the group of patients who had no resection was divided into those with either good resectable or bad resectable tumors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of post-progression survival by age, MGMT, KPS, and adjuvant therapy. Post-progression survival is presented in Kaplan-Meier estimates, each bivariately stratified by extent of resection and age (A), MGMT methylation (B), KPS (C), or adjuvant therapy (D).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-progression survival in patients with favorable and unfavorable constellation of covariates. Panel (A) shows post-progression survival in Kaplan-Meier estimates for patients with a favorable and panel (B) for an unfavorable constellation of the covariates age, MGMT, KPS, and adjuvant therapy stratified by extent of resection.

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Patil N, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017. Neuro-Oncology (2020) 22:iv1–iv96. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg DM, Lhermitte B, et al. . Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma. JAMA (2017) 318:2306–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishikawa R, et al. . Bevacizumab Plus Radiotherapy–Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med (2014) 370:709–22. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1308345 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, et al. . A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med (2014) 370:699–708. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1308573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, Alexander BM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Barthel FP, et al. . Glioblastoma in Adults: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Consensus Review on Current Management and Future Directions. Neuro-Oncology (2020) 22:1073–113. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed