Trends in Staging, Treatment, and Survival in Colorectal Cancer Between 1990 and 2014 in the Rotterdam Study
- PMID: 35252018
- PMCID: PMC8889566
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849951
Trends in Staging, Treatment, and Survival in Colorectal Cancer Between 1990 and 2014 in the Rotterdam Study
Abstract
Background: This study aims to assess trends in patient-related factors and treatment strategies in Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their effect on survival.
Methods: Data were obtained from the Rotterdam study, an ongoing population-based study of individuals aged ≥45 years. Between 1990 and 2014, incident, pathology-confirmed CRC cases were divided into two groups based on date of diagnosis (either before or after January 1, 2003). Patient characteristics, initial treatment, and date of mortality were collected. Analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: Of 14,928 individuals, 272 developed colon cancer and 124 rectal cancer. Median follow-up was 13.2 years. Patients diagnosed after January 1, 2003 were treated chemotherapeutically more often than those diagnosed prior to this date in colon cancer (28.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02) and treated more often with chemotherapy (38.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.02) and radiotherapy (41.3% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.001) in rectal cancer. Overall survival, adjusted for patient, tumor characteristics, and treatment, improved in rectal cancer (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.74) but remained stable in colon cancer (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.84-1.95).
Conclusion: Chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy are increasingly used in CRC patients. Survival in rectal cancer improved, whereas in colon cancer this was not observed.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; survival; treatment; trends; tumor staging.
Copyright © 2022 Lavrijssen, Ruiter, Fest, Ikram, Stricker and van Eijck.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Survival of colorectal cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam: comparison between 2002-09 and 2010-17.BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08224-6. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33926405 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal cancer in Crohn's disease: a Scandinavian population-based cohort study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;5(5):475-484. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30005-4. Epub 2020 Feb 14. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32066530
-
Trends in presentation, treatment and survival of 1777 patients with colorectal cancer over a decade: a Biobank study.Acta Oncol. 2018 Jun;57(6):735-742. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1420230. Epub 2017 Dec 23. Acta Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29275667
-
A relationship to survival is seen by combining the factors of mismatch repair status, tumor location and age of onset in colorectal cancer patients.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0172799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172799. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28253296 Free PMC article.
-
Does IBD Portend Worse Outcomes in Patients with Rectal Cancer? A Case-Matched Analysis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Sep;63(9):1265-1275. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001666. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. PMID: 33216497
Cited by
-
The analysis between clinicopathological aspect of early-onset vs. late-onset colorectal cancer and mortality rate: a cross-sectional study.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 May 3;85(6):2496-2501. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000757. eCollection 2023 Jun. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37363503 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging in the era of risk-adapted treatment in colon cancer.Br J Radiol. 2024 Jun 18;97(1159):1214-1221. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae061. Br J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38648743 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of Circulating Tumor DNA to Guide Decision-making in Adjuvant Colon Cancer.Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):959-966. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01565-y. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Curr Oncol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38842605 Review.
References
-
- Gersten O, Wilmoth JR. The Cancer Transition in Japan Since 1951. Demogr Res (2002) 7:271–306. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.5 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources