Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;69(6):e29644.
doi: 10.1002/pbc.29644. Epub 2022 Mar 6.

Clinical group and modified TNM stage for rhabdomyosarcoma: A review from the Children's Oncology Group

Affiliations
Review

Clinical group and modified TNM stage for rhabdomyosarcoma: A review from the Children's Oncology Group

Jacquelyn N Crane et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) uses Clinical Group (CG) and modified Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage to classify rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). CG is based on surgicopathologic findings and is determined after the completion of initial surgical procedure(s) but prior to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The modified TNM stage is based on clinical and radiographic findings and is assigned prior to any treatment. These systems have evolved over several decades. We review the history, evolution, and rationale behind the current CG and modified TNM classification systems used by COG for RMS. Data from the seven most recently completed and reported frontline COG trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARST0431, ARST0531, ARST08P1) were analyzed, and confirm that CG and modified TNM stage remain relevant and useful for predicting prognosis in RMS. We propose updates based on recent data and discuss factors warranting future study to further optimize these classification systems.

Keywords: clinical group; rhabdomyosarcoma; stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Evolution of the CG and COG modified TNM Classification Systems.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Outcome data.
A. EFS by clinical group; B. EFS by modified TNM stage; C. EFS by primary tumor site, including only patients with localized or regional disease; D. EFS by primary tumor size, including only patients with localized or regional disease; E. EFS by clinical regional lymph node status including only patients with localized or regional disease. F. Optimal primary tumor size cut off for EFS is shown as the point that maximizes the absolute value of log rank statistic (ABS(sk)). This is based on data in the COG database from the IRS-V / D-series studies D9602, D9802, D9803, and ARST studies ARST0331, ARST0431, ATRS0531, ARST08P1.

Comment in

References

    1. Skapek SX, Ferrari A, Gupta AA, et al. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. January 2019;5(1):1. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0051-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence W, Anderson JR, Gehan EA, Maurer H. Pretreatment TNM staging of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group. Children's Cancer Study Group. Pediatric Oncology Group. Cancer. Sep 1997;80(6):1165–70. - PubMed
    1. Maurer HM, Beltangady M, Gehan EA, et al. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-I. A final report. Cancer. Jan 1988;61(2):209–20. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19880115)61:2<209::aid-cncr2820610202>3.0.co;2-l - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maurer HM, Moon T, Donaldson M, et al. The intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study: a preliminary report. Cancer. Nov 1977;40(5):2015–26. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197711)40:5<2015::aid-cncr2820400505>3.0.co;2-k - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malempati S, Hawkins DS. Rhabdomyosarcoma: review of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee experience and rationale for current COG studies. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jul 2012;59(1):5–10. doi:10.1002/pbc.24118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types