Editorial for "Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI"
- PMID: 35253949
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28144
Editorial for "Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI"
Comment on
-
Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Nov;56(5):1600-1608. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28145. Epub 2022 Mar 14. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35285561 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA 2016;316:2627-2646.
-
- Jenkins HJ, Downie AS, Maher CG, Moloney NA, Magnussen JS, Hancock MJ. Imaging for low back pain: Is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 2018;18:2266-2277.
-
- Sollmann N, Bonnheim NB, Joseph GB, et al. Paraspinal muscle in chronic low back pain: Comparison between standard parameters and chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;56(5):1600-1608.
-
- Needell SD, Zlatkin MB. Comparison of fat-saturation fast spin echo versus conventional spin-echo MRI in the detection of rotator cuff pathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:674-677.
-
- Tamai K, Chen J, Stone M, et al. The evaluation of lumbar paraspinal muscle quantity and quality using the Goutallier classification and lumbar indentation value. Eur Spine J 2018;27:1005-1012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
