Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):405-413.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0067.

Multicenter Consensus Approach to Evaluation of Neonatal Hypotonia in the Genomic Era: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Multicenter Consensus Approach to Evaluation of Neonatal Hypotonia in the Genomic Era: A Review

Sarah U Morton et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Infants with hypotonia can present with a variety of potentially severe clinical signs and symptoms and often require invasive testing and multiple procedures. The wide range of clinical presentations and potential etiologies leaves diagnosis and prognosis uncertain, underscoring the need for rapid elucidation of the underlying genetic cause of disease.

Observations: The clinical application of exome sequencing or genome sequencing has dramatically improved the timely yield of diagnostic testing for neonatal hypotonia, with diagnostic rates of greater than 50% in academic neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US, which compose the International Precision Child Health Partnership (IPCHiP). A total of 74% (17 of 23) of patients had a change in clinical care in response to genetic diagnosis, including 2 patients who received targeted therapy. This narrative review discusses the common causes of neonatal hypotonia, the relative benefits and limitations of available testing modalities used in NICUs, and hypotonia management recommendations.

Conclusions and relevance: This narrative review summarizes the causes of neonatal hypotonia and the benefits of prompt genetic diagnosis, including improved prognostication and identification of targeted treatments which can improve the short-term and long-term outcomes. Institutional resources can vary among different NICUs; as a result, consideration should be given to rule out a small number of relatively unique conditions for which rapid targeted genetic testing is available. Nevertheless, the consensus recommendation is to use rapid genome or exome sequencing as a first-line testing option for NICU patients with unexplained hypotonia. As part of the IPCHiP, this diagnostic experience will be collected in a central database with the goal of advancing knowledge of neonatal hypotonia and improving evidence-based practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Christodoulou reported being a named investigator on a grant that involved next-generation sequencing of infants as part of an ultrarapid genomic testing research project; he reported receiving no direct funding through this project; however, some of the data generated in this project was included in the manuscript. Dr Muntoni reported receiving grants from Sarepta Therapeutics and Biogen and consultant fees from Sarepta Therapeutics, Pfizer, Novartis, Dyne, Biogen, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Wojcik reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development during the conduct of the study. Dr Dowling reported receiving grants from Astellas for X-linked myotubular myopathy gene therapy research and medical advisory fees from Dynacure and Kate Therapuetics outside the submitted work; being the chair of the TREAT NMD executive committee; and being on the scientific advisory boards of the RYR1 Foundation, Muscular Dystrophy Association, and Muscular Dystrophy Canada. Dr Darras reported serving as an ad hoc scientific advisory board member for Audentes, AveXis/Novartis Gene Therapies, Biogen, Pfizer, Vertex and Roche/Genentech; serving as steering committee chair for the Roche FIREFISH study; being a data safety monitoring board member for Amicus Inc; receiving research support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Slaney Family Fund for spinal muscular atrophy, the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation, CureSMA, and Working on Walking Fund; receiving research grants from Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc, Biogen, Sarepta Pharmaceuticals, Novartis (AveXis), PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Scholar Rock, and Fibrogen; and receiving royalties for books and online publications from Elsevier and UpToDate Inc. Dr Rowitch reported having a contract with Illumina UK for whole-genome sequencing. Dr Agrawal reported being a member of the scientific advisory board of GeneDx and Illumina Inc. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Physical Examination Findings in Neonatal Hypotonia
A, Observational findings during examination of infants with primary hypotonia can include frog-leg positioning owing to low tone and paucity of movement, the presence of a nasogastric feeding tube owing to poor feeding, tracheostomy for respiratory failure, knee dimpling from restricted movements in utero, and ptosis with myopathic facies in neuromuscular junction disorders. B, Physical examination maneuvers including horizontal suspension, lift to sitting position, and ankle flexion demonstrate differences between typical infants and infants with hypotonia. C, Prader-Willi syndrome can be accompanied by narrow nasal bridge, narrowing of the forehead at the temples, almond-shaped eyes, thin upper lip, and down-turned corners of the mouth. Infants with spinal muscular atrophy can demonstrate bell-shaped chest, retractions with respirations, paucity of movement, and passive positioning with flexed hips and knees. Congenital muscular dystrophy is often associated with joint contractures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Consensus Diagnostic Algorithm for Neonatal Hypotonia
Evaluation of infants with hypotonia should include early exome of genome sequencing. Clinicians should also consider concomitant chromosomal microarray if other anomalies present, spinal muscular atrophy if not included in newborn screening, or type 1 myotonic dystrophy if evidence of myotonia in the mother. a Ensure evaluation for secondary causes, such as infectious disease, hypoglycemia, inborn errors of metabolism, and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

References

    1. Sparks SE. Neonatal hypotonia. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(2):363–371, ix. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2015.02.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lisi EC, Cohn RD. Genetic evaluation of the pediatric patient with hypotonia: perspective from a hypotonia specialty clinic and review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(7):586–599. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03918.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bodensteiner JB. The evaluation of the hypotonic infant. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2008;15(1):10–20. doi:10.1016/j.spen.2008.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fardeau M, Desguerre I. Diagnostic workup for neuromuscular diseases. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1291–1297. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00001-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prasad AN, Prasad C. Genetic evaluation of the floppy infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;16(2):99–108. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2010.11.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types