Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;18(6):e849-e856.
doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00689. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Near the End of Life

Affiliations

Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Near the End of Life

Matthew D Bloom et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent literature suggests an increasing use of systemic treatment in patients with advanced cancer near the end of life (EOL), partially driven by the increasing adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While studies have identified this trend, additional variables associated with ICI use at EOL are limited. Our aim was to characterize a population of patients who received a dose of ICI in the last 30 days of life.

Methods: We performed a manual retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 18 years who died within 30 days of receiving a dose of ICI. Metrics such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), number of ICI doses, need for hospitalization, and numerous other variables were evaluated.

Results: Over a 4-year time period, 97 patients received an ICI at EOL. For 40% of patients, the ICI given in the 30 days before death was their only dose. Over 50% of patients had an ECOG PS of ≥ 2, including 17% of patients with an ECOG PS of 3. Over 60% were hospitalized, 65% visited the emergency department, 20% required intensive care unit admission, and 25% died in the hospital.

Conclusion: Our study contributes to the ongoing literature regarding the risks and benefits of ICI use in patients with advanced cancer near the EOL. While accurate predictions regarding the EOL are challenging, oncologists may routinely use clinical factors such as ECOG PS along with patient preferences to guide recommendations and shared decision making. Ultimately, further follow-up studies to better characterize and prognosticate this population of patients are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Thomas J. GeorgeConsulting or Advisory Role: Tempus, PfizerResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), BioMed Valley Discoveries (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/321938 Merry J. MarkhamStock and Other Ownership Interests: PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKlineResearch Funding: Aduro Biotech (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Novartis (Inst), VBL Therapeutics (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/890992/summaryNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources