Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: Techniques, Controversies, and Comparison to Open Techniques
- PMID: 35255490
- DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00949
Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: Techniques, Controversies, and Comparison to Open Techniques
Abstract
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) continues to rise in popularity as a treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome. Numerous variations in technique and instrumentation currently exist, broadly classified into two-portal and single-portal techniques with antegrade and retrograde designs. ECTR is equally effective as open carpal tunnel release for alleviating symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome with no differences in long-term outcomes. ECTR has an increased risk of transient nerve injury, whereas open carpal tunnel release has an increased risk of wound and scar complications. ECTR has higher direct costs but is associated with earlier return to work. ECTR is a safe and effective approach to carpal tunnel release in the hands of experienced surgeons.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
References
-
- Devana SK, Jensen AR, Yamaguchi KT, et al.: Trends and complications in open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release in private payer and Medicare patient populations. Hand (N Y) 2019;14:455-461.
-
- Cranford CS, Ho JY, Kalainov DM, Hartigan BJ: Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:537-548.
-
- Palmer DH, Hanrahan LP: Social and economic costs of carpal tunnel surgery. Instr Course Lect 1995;44:167-172.
-
- Law TY, Rosas S, Hubbard ZS, Chieng LO, Chim HW: Trends in open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release utilization in the Medicare patient population. J Surg Res 2017;214:9-13.
-
- Leinberry CF, Rivlin M, Maltenfort M, et al.: Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American society for surgery of the hand: A 25-year perspective. J Hand Surg Am 2012;37:1997-2003.e3.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical