Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;27(2):69-83.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2044413. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

mHealth Interventions for Contraceptive Behavior Change in the United States: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

mHealth Interventions for Contraceptive Behavior Change in the United States: A Systematic Review

Alice F Cartwright et al. J Health Commun. .

Abstract

Ensuring people have access to their preferred method of contraception can be key for meeting their reproductive goals. A growing number of mHealth interventions show promise for improving access to contraception, but no literature review has identified the effects of mHealth interventions among both adolescents and adults in the United States. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe the format, theoretical basis, and impact of mHealth interventions for contraceptive behavior change (contraceptive initiation and continuation) among people of all ages in the US. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using six electronic databases guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data on study design, frequency, duration, mHealth modality, contraceptive method, behavior change theory, and behavioral outcome were extracted to facilitate comparison. Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria. The majority (11; 61%) used SMS (short message service). Twelve studies focused on contraceptive initiation, most (n = 8) of which also measured continued use over time. The remaining six interventions focused on continuation alone, generally through appointment reminders. Very little contraceptive behavior change was identified across studies. Current mHealth interventions may hold promise for some health areas but there is little evidence that they change contraceptive behavior. Future mHealth interventions should focus on assessing person-centered outcomes, including satisfaction, side effects, and reasons for discontinuation, to best support people to use their preferred contraceptive method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
PRISMA flow diagram for systematic reviews

References

    1. Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
    1. Aubrey JS, Pitts MJ, Lutovsky BR, Jiao J, Yan K, & Stanley SJ (2020). Investigating Disparities by Sex and LGBTQ Identity: A Content Analysis of Sexual Health Information on College Student Health Center Websites. Journal of Health Communication, 25(7), 584–593. 10.1080/10810730.2020.1825567 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Britton LE, Alspaugh A, Greene MZ, & McLemore MR (2020). CE: An Evidence-Based Update on Contraception. The American Journal of Nursing, 120(2), 22–33. 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000654304.29632.a7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchanan CRM, Tomaszewski K, Chung S, Upadhya KK, Ramsey A, & Trent ME (2018). Why Didn’t You Text Me? Poststudy Trends From the DepoText Trial. Clinical Pediatrics, 57(1), 82–88. 10.1177/0009922816689674 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bull J, Rowland S, Lundberg O, Berglund-Scherwitzl E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Trussell J, & Scherwitzl R (2019). Typical use effectiveness of Natural Cycles: Postmarket surveillance study investigating the impact of previous contraceptive choice on the risk of unintended pregnancy. BMJ Open, 9(3), e026474. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026474 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances