Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 16;14(1):10-18.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718862. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Flap Monitoring Using Transcutaneous Oxygen or Carbon Dioxide Measurements

Affiliations
Review

Flap Monitoring Using Transcutaneous Oxygen or Carbon Dioxide Measurements

Sameer H Halani et al. J Hand Microsurg. .

Abstract

Free tissue transfer is a cornerstone of complex reconstruction. In many cases, it represents the last option available for a patient and their reconstruction. At high-volume centers, the risk of free flap failure is low but its occurrence can be devastating. Currently, the mainstay for flap monitoring is the clinical examination. Though reliable when performed by experienced clinicians, the flap exam is largely subjective, is performed discontinuously, and often results in significant time delay between detection of flap compromise and intervention. Among emerging flap monitoring technologies, the most promising appear to be those that rely on noninvasive transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide measurements, which provide information regarding flap perfusion. In this article, we review and summarize the literature on various techniques but primarily emphasizing those technologies that rely on transcutaneous gas measurements. We also define characteristics for the ideal flap monitoring tool and discuss critical barriers, predominantly cost, preventing more widespread utilization of adjunct monitoring technologies, and their implications.

Keywords: carbon dioxide; flap monitoring; systematic review; transcutaneous oxygen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram for transcutaneous oxygen and/or carbon dioxide measurements for free flap monitoring61. PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

References

    1. Jones B M. Monitors for the cutaneous microcirculation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(05):843–850. - PubMed
    1. Chae M P, Rozen W M, Whitaker I S. Current evidence for postoperative monitoring of microvascular free flaps: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(05):621–632. - PubMed
    1. Scheufler O, Exner K, Andresen R. Investigation of TRAM flap oxygenation and perfusion by near-infrared reflection spectroscopy and color-coded duplex sonography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(01):141–152. - PubMed
    1. Schiltz D, Taeger C D, Biermann N. Transcutaneous oxygen measurement using ratiometric fluorescence imaging as a valid method for monitoring free flap transplants. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;73(01):113–123. - PubMed
    1. Trignano E, Fallico N, Fiorot L. Flap monitoring with continuous oxygen partial tension measurement in breast reconstructive surgery: a preliminary report. Microsurgery. 2018;38(04):402–406. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources