Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;38(5):761-768.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05106-1. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Affiliations

Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Hiroyuki Koga et al. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 May.

Abstract

Purpose: A five-parameter fecal continence evaluation questionnaire (FCEQ) and incidence of complications were used for long-term assessment of laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for treating male imperforate anus (MIA) with rectobulbar (RB) or rectoprostatic (RP) fistulas.

Methods: Subjects were 64 consecutive Japanese MIA patients with RB or RP fistulas treated at a single institution between 1995 and 2021. FCEQ data collected retrospectively were used to calculate a fecal continence evaluation (FCE) score (best = 10) and coefficient of variation for FCE (FCECV). The statistical significance threshold was defined at p < 0.05.

Results: Fistulas were RB (n = 40; LAARP = 25/40, PSARP = 15/40) or RP (n = 24; LAARP = 17/24, PSARP = 7/24). Mean ages at surgery and status of the sacrum were similar (p = 0.06, 0.05 and 0.51). FCE scores in RP-LAARP were consistently higher with less FCECV but differences were only statistically significant from 7 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). While FCE scores for RB-LAARP and RB-PSARP were similar (p = 0.99), FCECV were lower for RB-LAARP compared with RB-PSARP. LAARP was associated with less-wound infections, but greater incidence of anal mucosal prolapse unrelated to preoperative status of the sacrum.

Conclusion: Long-term postoperative FCEQ assessment favored LAARP for treating MIA with either RB or RP fistulas.

Keywords: Imperforate anus; Laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty; Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty; Recto-bulbar fistula; Recto-prostatic fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.6925 (discussion 30–1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Hozaim O, Al-Maary J, AlQahtani A, Zamakhshary M (2010) Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a systematic review and the need for standardization of outcome reporting. J Pediatr Surg 45:1500–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han Y, Xia Z, Guo S, Yu X, Li Z (2017) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12:e0170421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170421 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Yazaki Y, Koga H, Ochi T, Okawada M, Doi T, Lane GJ et al (2016) Surgical management of recto-prostatic and recto-bulbar anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 32:939–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3948-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ichijo C, Kaneyama K, Hayashi Y, Koga H, Okazaki T, Lane GJ et al (2008) Midterm postoperative clinicoradiologic analysis of surgery for high/intermediate-type imperforate anus: prospective comparative study between laparoscopy-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 43:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.037 (discussion 62–3) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources