Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
- PMID: 35257221
- DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05106-1
Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
Abstract
Purpose: A five-parameter fecal continence evaluation questionnaire (FCEQ) and incidence of complications were used for long-term assessment of laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for treating male imperforate anus (MIA) with rectobulbar (RB) or rectoprostatic (RP) fistulas.
Methods: Subjects were 64 consecutive Japanese MIA patients with RB or RP fistulas treated at a single institution between 1995 and 2021. FCEQ data collected retrospectively were used to calculate a fecal continence evaluation (FCE) score (best = 10) and coefficient of variation for FCE (FCECV). The statistical significance threshold was defined at p < 0.05.
Results: Fistulas were RB (n = 40; LAARP = 25/40, PSARP = 15/40) or RP (n = 24; LAARP = 17/24, PSARP = 7/24). Mean ages at surgery and status of the sacrum were similar (p = 0.06, 0.05 and 0.51). FCE scores in RP-LAARP were consistently higher with less FCECV but differences were only statistically significant from 7 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). While FCE scores for RB-LAARP and RB-PSARP were similar (p = 0.99), FCECV were lower for RB-LAARP compared with RB-PSARP. LAARP was associated with less-wound infections, but greater incidence of anal mucosal prolapse unrelated to preoperative status of the sacrum.
Conclusion: Long-term postoperative FCEQ assessment favored LAARP for treating MIA with either RB or RP fistulas.
Keywords: Imperforate anus; Laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty; Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty; Recto-bulbar fistula; Recto-prostatic fistula.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.6925 (discussion 30–1) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Hozaim O, Al-Maary J, AlQahtani A, Zamakhshary M (2010) Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a systematic review and the need for standardization of outcome reporting. J Pediatr Surg 45:1500–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Han Y, Xia Z, Guo S, Yu X, Li Z (2017) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12:e0170421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170421 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Yazaki Y, Koga H, Ochi T, Okawada M, Doi T, Lane GJ et al (2016) Surgical management of recto-prostatic and recto-bulbar anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 32:939–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3948-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ichijo C, Kaneyama K, Hayashi Y, Koga H, Okazaki T, Lane GJ et al (2008) Midterm postoperative clinicoradiologic analysis of surgery for high/intermediate-type imperforate anus: prospective comparative study between laparoscopy-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 43:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.037 (discussion 62–3) - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources