Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 19;11(4):e31923.
doi: 10.2196/31923.

Conversational Agents in Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Leigh Powell #  1 , Mohammed Zayan Nizam #  1   2 , Radwa Nour  1 , Youness Zidoun  1 , Randa Sleibi  1 , Sreelekshmi Kaladhara Warrier  1 , Hanan Al Suwaidi  3 , Nabil Zary  1
Affiliations

Conversational Agents in Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Leigh Powell et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Conversational agents have the ability to reach people through multiple mediums, including the online space, mobile phones, and hardware devices like Alexa and Google Home. Conversational agents provide an engaging method of interaction while making information easier to access. Their emergence into areas related to public health and health education is perhaps unsurprising. While the building of conversational agents is getting more simplified with time, there are still requirements of time and effort. There is also a lack of clarity and consistent terminology regarding what constitutes a conversational agent, how these agents are developed, and the kinds of resources that are needed to develop and sustain them. This lack of clarity creates a daunting task for those seeking to build conversational agents for health education initiatives.

Objective: This scoping review aims to identify literature that reports on the design and implementation of conversational agents to promote and educate the public on matters related to health. We will categorize conversational agents in health education in alignment with current classifications and terminology emerging from the marketplace. We will clearly define the variety levels of conversational agents, categorize currently existing agents within these levels, and describe the development models, tools, and resources being used to build conversational agents for health care education purposes.

Methods: This scoping review will be conducted by employing the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We will also be adhering to the enhancements and updates proposed by Levac et al and Peters et al. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews will guide the reporting of this scoping review. A systematic search for published and grey literature will be undertaken from the following databases: (1) PubMed, (2) PsychINFO, (3) Embase, (4) Web of Science, (5) SCOPUS, (6) CINAHL, (7) ERIC, (8) MEDLINE, and (9) Google Scholar. Data charting will be done using a structured format.

Results: Initial searches of the databases retrieved 1305 results. The results will be presented in the final scoping review in a narrative and illustrative manner.

Conclusions: This scoping review will report on conversational agents being used in health education today, and will include categorization of the levels of the agents and report on the kinds of tools, resources, and design and development methods used.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/31923.

Keywords: artificial intelligence assistants; artificial intelligence chatbots; chatbots; classification; conversational agents; conversational artificial intelligence; health education; health promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adamopoulou E, Moussiades L. An Overview of Chatbot Technology. In: Maglogiannis I, Iliadis L, Pimenidis E, editors. Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 584. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 373–383.
    1. Echeazarra L, Pereira J, Saracho R. TensioBot: a Chatbot Assistant for Self-Managed in-House Blood Pressure Checking. J Med Syst. 2021 Mar 15;45(4):54. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01730-x.10.1007/s10916-021-01730-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh K, Lee D, Ko B, Choi H. A Chatbot for Psychiatric Counseling in Mental Healthcare Service Based on Emotional Dialogue Analysis and Sentence Generation. 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM); May 29-June 1, 2017; Daejeon, South Korea. 2017. pp. 371–375. - DOI
    1. Adam M, Wessel M, Benlian A. AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electron Markets. 2021;31(2):427–445. doi: 10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7. - DOI
    1. Vaidyam AN, Wisniewski H, Halamka JD, Kashavan MS, Torous JB. Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):456–464. doi: 10.1177/0706743719828977. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30897957 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources