Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun 1;205(11):1330-1336.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2092OC.

A Pragmatic, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-controlled Clinical Trial of Real-Time Pneumonia Clinical Decision Support

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Pragmatic, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-controlled Clinical Trial of Real-Time Pneumonia Clinical Decision Support

Nathan C Dean et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: Care of emergency department (ED) patients with pneumonia can be challenging. Clinical decision support may decrease unnecessary variation and improve care. Objectives: To report patient outcomes and processes of care after deployment of electronic pneumonia clinical decision support (ePNa): a comprehensive, open loop, real-time clinical decision support embedded within the electronic health record. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-controlled trial with deployment at 2-month intervals in 16 community hospitals. ePNa extracts real-time and historical data to guide diagnosis, risk stratification, microbiological studies, site of care, and antibiotic therapy. We included all adult ED patients with pneumonia over the course of 3 years identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge coding confirmed by chest imaging. Measurements and Main Results: The median age of the 6,848 patients was 67 years (interquartile range, 50-79), and 48% were female; 64.8% were hospital admitted. Unadjusted mortality was 8.6% before and 4.8% after deployment. A mixed effects logistic regression model adjusting for severity of illness with hospital cluster as the random effect showed an adjusted odds ratio of 0.62 (0.49-0.79; P < 0.001) for 30-day all-cause mortality after deployment. Lower mortality was consistent across hospital clusters. ePNa-concordant antibiotic prescribing increased from 83.5% to 90.2% (P < 0.001). The mean time from ED admission to first antibiotic was 159.4 (156.9-161.9) minutes at baseline and 150.9 (144.1-157.8) minutes after deployment (P < 0.001). Outpatient disposition from the ED increased from 29.2% to 46.9%, whereas 7-day secondary hospital admission was unchanged (5.2% vs. 6.1%). ePNa was used by ED clinicians in 67% of eligible patients. Conclusions: ePNa deployment was associated with improved processes of care and lower mortality. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03358342).

Keywords: antibiotic use; clinical decision support; emergency department; mortality; pneumonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Stepwise deployment into six hospital clusters at 2-month intervals. The predeployment period was 18 months before deployment in each cluster. The postdeployment period began after the 2-month washout period and ended in June 2019. The number of pneumonia patients per cluster per period is contained within the bars. Three larger urban hospitals with ICUs staffed by critical care physicians are included in clusters 1–3; five medium-sized hospitals in smaller cities and suburbs with ICUs staffed by hospitalists in consultation with telemedicine critical care physicians are included in clusters 2–5; eight smaller rural hospitals whose family practice clinicians transfer patients to hospitals with ICUs in consultation with telemedicine critical care physicians are included in clusters 2–6.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Severity-adjusted mortality by site of care after emergency department (ED) discharge. Severity-adjusted mortality before ePNa deployment versus after ePNa deployment was 1.4% versus 2.0% for patients with outpatient disposition, 6.0% versus 4.6% for hospital ward disposition, and 15.0% versus 7.4% for ICU disposition. ePNa = electronic pneumonia clinical decision support.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Electronic pneumonia clinical decision support use based on individual case reviews by cluster at intervals after the washout periods.

Comment in

References

    1. Ramirez JA, Wiemken TL, Peyrani P, Arnold FW, Kelley R, Mattingly WA, et al. University of Louisville Pneumonia Study Group Adults hospitalized with pneumonia in the United States: incidence, epidemiology, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis . 2017;65:1806–1812. - PubMed
    1. Niederman MS, Luna CM. Community-acquired pneumonia guidelines: a global perspective. Semin Respir Crit Care Med . 2012;33:298–310. - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal GE, Harper DL, Shah A, Covinsky KE. A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions. J Gen Intern Med . 1997;12:416–422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McMahon LF, Jr, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ. Variation in hospital admissions among small areas. A comparison of Maine and Michigan. Med Care . 1989;27:623–631. - PubMed
    1. Dean NC, Jones JP, Aronsky D, Brown S, Vines CG, Jones BE, et al. Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med . 2012;59:35–41. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data