Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e053680.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053680.

Lived experiences of healthcare workers on the front line during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

Kate Grailey  1 , Adam Lound  2 , Stephen Brett  3
Affiliations

Lived experiences of healthcare workers on the front line during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

Kate Grailey et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the presence of perceived stressors, psychological safety and teamwork in healthcare professionals. As the timeframe for this study spanned the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, data were captured demonstrating the impact of the pandemic on these factors.

Design: Qualitative interview study.

Setting: All staff working within the emergency and critical care departments of one National Health Service Trust in London, UK.

Participants: Forty-nine participants were recruited using a purposive sampling technique and interviewed when the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had subsided.

Main outcome measures: Evaluation of changes in perceived stressors, psychological safety and teamwork in individuals working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: The thematic analysis relating to a participant's lived experiences while working during COVID-19 led to the construction of five key themes, including 'psychological effects' and 'changes in team dynamics'. Several psychological effects were described, including the presence of psychological distress and insights into the aetiology of moral injury. There was marked heterogeneity in participants' response to COVID-19, particularly with respect to changes in team dynamics and the perception of a psychologically safe environment. Descriptions of improved team cohesiveness and camaraderie contrasted with stories of new barriers, notably due to the high workload and the impact of personal protective equipment. Building on these themes, a map of key changes arising due to the pandemic was developed, highlighting potential opportunities to provide targeted support.

Conclusions: Working on the front line of a pandemic can have significant implications for healthcare workers, putting them at risk of psychological distress and moral injury, as well as affecting team dynamics. There is striking heterogeneity in the manifestation of these challenges. Team leaders can use the themes and qualitative data from this study to help identify areas for management focus and individual and team support.

Keywords: COVID-19; accident & emergency medicine; adult intensive & critical care; health services administration & management; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thematic framework highlighting the major themes and subthemes constructed during the thematic analysis. PPE, personal protective equipment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Supporting qualitative data illustrating the theme psychological distress and the associated subthemes (theme 1).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Supporting qualitative data illustrating the theme changes in team dynamics and the associated subthemes (theme 2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Supporting qualitative data illustrating the theme changes in psychological safety and the associated subthemes (theme 3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Supporting qualitative data illustrating the theme impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the associated subthemes (theme 4).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Supporting qualitative data illustrating the theme changes in workplace stressors and the associated subthemes (theme 5).
Figure 7
Figure 7
A map of the changes in team dynamics and potential psychological effects as a consequence of the pandemic, with suggestions to mitigate these. PPE, personal protective equipment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mateen BA, Wilde H, Dennis JM, et al. . Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis. BMJ Open 2021;11:e042945. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Healthcare in London. Available: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare?areaType=nhsregion&ar...
    1. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209–18. 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995;33:335–43. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali S, Maguire S, Marks E, et al. . Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers at acute hospital settings in the south-east of ireland: an observational cohort multicentre study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e042930. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042930 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types