Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;30(6):1915-1926.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06849-5. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Biological augmentation of meniscal repair: a systematic review

Rachel E Keller  1 , Evan A O'Donnell  2 , Giovanna I S Medina  2 , Shannon E Linderman  2 , Timothy T W Cheng  2 , Orlando D Sabbag  2 , Luke S Oh  2
Affiliations

Biological augmentation of meniscal repair: a systematic review

Rachel E Keller et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Orthopedic literature remains divided on the utility of biologic augmentation to optimize outcomes after isolated meniscal repair. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the clinical outcomes and re-operation rates of biologically augmented meniscal repairs.

Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were queried in October 2020 for published literature on isolated meniscal repair with biological augmentation. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias by two appraisal tools. Patient demographics, meniscal tear characteristics, surgical procedure, augmentation type, post-operative rehabilitation, patient reported outcome measures, and length of follow-up were recorded, reviewed, and analyzed by two independent reviewers.

Results: Of 3794 articles, 18 met inclusion criteria and yielded 537 patients who underwent biologic augmentation of meniscal repair. The biologically augmented repair rates were 5.8-27.0% with PRP augmentation, 0.0-28.5% with fibrin clot augmentation, 0.0-12.9% with marrow stimulation, and 0.0% with stem cell augmentation. One of seven studies showed lower revision rates with augmented meniscal repair compared to standard repair techniques, whereas five of seven found no benefit. Three of ten studies found significant functional improvement of biologically augmented repair versus standard repair techniques and six of ten studies found no difference. There was significant heterogeneity in methods for biologic preparation, delivery, and post-operative rehabilitation protocols.

Conclusion: Patients reported significant improvements in functional outcomes scores after repair with biological augmentation, though the benefit over standard repair controls is questionable. Revision rates after biologically augmented meniscal repair also appear similar to standard repair techniques. Clinicians should bear this in mind when considering biologic augmentation in the setting of meniscal repair.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: Biological augmentation; Fibrin clot; Marrow stimulation; Meniscal repair; Meniscus; Mesenchymal stem cells; Platelet-rich plasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahn J-H, Kwon O-J, Nam T-S (2015) Arthroscopic repair of horizontal meniscal cleavage tears with marrow-stimulating technique. Arthroscopy 31(1):92–98 - DOI
    1. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1982) Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med 10(2):90–95 - DOI
    1. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF, Spivak JM (1988) Meniscal repair using an exogenous fibrin clot. An experimental study in dogs. J Bone Jt Surg 70(8):1209–1217 - DOI
    1. Bernard CD, Kennedy NI, Tagliero AJ, Camp CL, Saris DBF, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ (2020) Medial meniscus posterior root tear treatment: a matched cohort comparison of nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, and repair. Am J Sports Med 48(1):128–132 - DOI
    1. Biedert RM (2000) Treatment of intrasubstance meniscal lesions: a randomized prospective study of four different methods. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 8(2):104–108 - DOI

Publication types

Substances