Student-Athletes', Coaches', and Administrators' Perspectives of Sexual Violence Prevention on Three Campuses with National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II Athletic Programs
- PMID: 35259318
- PMCID: PMC11321757
- DOI: 10.1177/08862605211067018
Student-Athletes', Coaches', and Administrators' Perspectives of Sexual Violence Prevention on Three Campuses with National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and II Athletic Programs
Abstract
Research has found associations between intercollegiate athletics and risk for sexual violence, and that sexual violence is more pervasive at colleges and universities with National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs, relative to NCAA Division II, NCAA Division III and no athletic programs. Simultaneously, sports involvement is linked with prosocial values and there are documented developmental benefits of sports participation. College athletic programs hold promise for fostering sexual violence prevention but there is limited knowledge about how student-athletes conceptualize sexual violence and how athletes, coaches, and administrators perceive available prevention and response programs. We conducted seven Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and 21 In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) with student-athletes, athletic directors, and coaches from public university Division I (n = 2) and Division II (n = 1) campuses. We assessed perceptions of sexual violence, knowledge and opinions of available prevention and response programs, and sought input on how to bridge gaps in campus sexual violence policies. Student-athletes associated sexual violence with alcohol in their relationships with peers and asymmetrical power dynamics in relationships with coaches and faculty. Athletes felt strong connections with teammates and sports programs but isolated from the larger campus. This created barriers to students' use of services and the likelihood of reporting sexual violence. Athletes felt the mandatory sexual violence prevention training, including additional NCAA components, were ineffective and offered to protect the university and its athletic programs from legal complications or cultural ridicule. Athletic staff were aware of policies and programs for reporting and referring sexual violence cases but their knowledge on how these served students was limited. Student-athletes were uncomfortable disclosing information regarding relationships and sexual violence to coaches and preferred peer-led prevention approaches.
Keywords: college athlete; prevention; reporting/disclosure; satudent resources; sexual harassment; sport; sports; support seeking.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Developing and implementing survivor-centred approaches for college student-athletes: perspectives from athletic department, Title IX, and campus advocacy personnel.Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2334587. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2334587. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024. PMID: 38590136 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and Formal Reporting of Sexual Violence among Undergraduate Student-Athletes: A Multi-State Study.J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP418-NP442. doi: 10.1177/08862605221081936. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Interpers Violence. 2023. PMID: 35475767
-
Factors Associated With Concussion Nondisclosure in Collegiate Student-Athletes.J Athl Train. 2021 Feb 1;56(2):157-163. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0102-20. J Athl Train. 2021. PMID: 33596598 Free PMC article.
-
Athlete advocacy: an examination of existing reporting frameworks and next steps.Phys Sportsmed. 2025 Feb;53(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2440821. Epub 2024 Dec 13. Phys Sportsmed. 2025. PMID: 39648878 Review.
-
Understanding Youth Sport Coaches' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Injury-Prevention Training Programs: A Systematic Literature Review.J Athl Train. 2022 Sep 1;57(9-10):877-893. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0215.22. J Athl Train. 2022. PMID: 36638345 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Opening the "Black Box": Student-Generated Solutions to Improve Sexual Violence Response and Prevention Efforts for Undergraduates on College Campuses.Violence Against Women. 2022 Nov;28(14):3554-3587. doi: 10.1177/10778012211068063. Epub 2022 Jan 18. Violence Against Women. 2022. PMID: 35040708 Free PMC article.
-
Developing and implementing survivor-centred approaches for college student-athletes: perspectives from athletic department, Title IX, and campus advocacy personnel.Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2334587. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2334587. Epub 2024 Apr 8. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024. PMID: 38590136 Free PMC article.
-
Student, Staff, and Faculty Perspectives on Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence on 3 Public University Campuses: Protocol for the UC Speaks Up Study and Preliminary Results.JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(4):e31189. doi: 10.2196/31189. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35380114 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of Interpersonal Violence in Sport and Perceived Coaching Style Among College Athletes.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50248. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38227316 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical