Cervical spine immobilization does not interfere with nasotracheal intubation performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy: a randomized equivalence trial
- PMID: 35260735
- PMCID: PMC8904815
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08035-0
Cervical spine immobilization does not interfere with nasotracheal intubation performed using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy: a randomized equivalence trial
Abstract
GlideScope-assisted nasotracheal intubation (NTI) has been proposed as an alternative to difficult orotracheal intubation for critical patients or those under cervical immobilization. We evaluated the difficulty of performing NTI using GlideScope under cervical orthosis. A total of 170 patients scheduled for elective cervical spinal surgery that required NTI were randomized to receive cervical immobilization using a cervical collar (collar group) or no cervical immobilization at all (control group) before anesthetic induction (group assignment at 1:1 ratio). All NTI during anesthetic induction were performed using the GlideScope. The primary outcome was time to intubation. The secondary outcomes were ease of intubation, including the necessity of auxiliary manipulations to assist intubation, and the nasotracheal intubation difficulty scale (nasoIDS). An exploratory analysis identified morphometric parameters as predictors of time to intubation, the necessity of auxiliary manipulations, and a nasoIDS score ≥ 4. For time to intubation, the mean difference (collar group-control) was - 4.19 s, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of - 13.9 to 5.52 that lay within our defined equivalence margin of 16 s. Multivariate regressions precluded the association of cervical immobilization with a necessity for auxiliary manipulations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.53, 95% CI [0.26-1.09], P = 0.083) and a nasoIDS ≥ 4 (aOR 0.94 [0.84-1.05], P = 0.280). Among all morphometric parameters, the upper lip bite test class was predictive of a longer time to intubation (all analyses relative to class 1, 14 s longer for class 2, P = 0.032; 24 s longer for class 3, P = 0.070), increased necessity for auxiliary manipulation (aOR 2.29 [1.06-4.94], P = 0.036 for class 2; aOR 6.12 [1.04-39.94], P = 0.045 for class 3), and nasoIDS ≥ 4 (aOR 1.46 [1.14-1.89], P = 0.003 for class 3).The present study demonstrated that GlideScope achieved NTI in patients with or without cervical immobilization equivalently with respect to intubation time and ease.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.Asian J Anesthesiol. 2017 Mar;55(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aja.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 8. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28846537 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 14;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32408862 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine.J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.080. Epub 2013 Jan 22. J Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23351572 Clinical Trial.
-
Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Oct;74(5):439-448. doi: 10.4097/kja.21234. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021. PMID: 34365774 Free PMC article.
-
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 25. J Clin Anesth. 2019. PMID: 30153543
Cited by
-
The Use of the Shikani Video-Assisted Intubating Stylet Technique in Patients with Restricted Neck Mobility.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 4;10(9):1688. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091688. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36141300 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical