Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):4077.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08188-y.

Echogenic swirling pattern, carcinoembryonic antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

Affiliations

Echogenic swirling pattern, carcinoembryonic antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

Chih-Feng Chian et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The echogenic swirling pattern has a role in predicting malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, its predictive ability is suboptimal, and its clinical utility remains to be defined. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic potential of the echogenic swirling pattern combined with pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and routine laboratory tests of pleural effusion in MPE. The 80 consecutive patients with underlying malignancy and pleural effusions were recruited. All patients underwent one diagnostic thoracentesis with a cytologic examination of pleural fluid. Our study showed that the sensitivity of echogenic swirling patterns in MPE diagnosis was 67.7%, specificity was 72.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 89.4%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 39.4%. Both CEA and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) had acceptable sensitivity (71.0% and 60.7%) and specificity (72.2% and 77.8%). Combining the echogenic swirling pattern, pleural CEA, and pleural LDH, the highest sensitivity (95.2%) with a good PPV (86.8) was reached. In this clinical study, we found that combining the echogenic swirling pattern, pleural CEA, and pleural LDH had a higher sensitivity and a high positive predictive value for the diagnosis of MPE. This combination is a potentially suitable method for MPE screening in cancer patients with pleural effusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the prediction of MPE.

References

    1. Antony VB, et al. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:1987–2001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.ats8-00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skok K, Hladnik G, Grm A, Crnjac A. Malignant pleural effusion and its current management: A review. Medicina. 2019;55:66. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assawasaksakul T, Boonsarngsuk V, Incharoen P. comparative study of conventional cytology and cell block method in the diagnosis of pleural effusion. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017;9:3161–3167. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.52. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maskell NA. BTS guidelines for the investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults. Thorax. 2003;58:8ii–17ii. doi: 10.1136/thx.58.suppl_2.ii8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanc FX, Atassi K, Bignon J, Housset B. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in pleural disease: A 6-year retrospective study. Chest. 2002;121:1677–1683. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1677. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms