Prospects for Augmenting Team Interactions with Real-Time Coordination-Based Measures in Human-Autonomy Teams
- PMID: 35261211
- DOI: 10.1111/tops.12606
Prospects for Augmenting Team Interactions with Real-Time Coordination-Based Measures in Human-Autonomy Teams
Abstract
Complex work in teams requires coordination across team members and their technology as well as the ability to change and adapt over time to achieve effective performance. To support such complex interactions, recent efforts have worked toward the design of adaptive human-autonomy teaming systems that can provide feedback in or near real time to achieve the desired individual or team results. However, while significant advancements have been made to better model and understand the dynamics of team interaction and its relationship with task performance, appropriate measures of team coordination and computational methods to detect changes in coordination have not yet been widely investigated. Having the capacity to measure coordination in real time is quite promising as it provides the opportunity to provide adaptive feedback that may influence and regulate teams' coordination patterns and, ultimately, drive effective team performance. A critical requirement to reach this potential is having the theoretical and empirical foundation from which to do so. Therefore, the first goal of the paper is to review approaches to coordination dynamics, identify current research gaps, and draw insights from other areas, such as social interaction, relationship science, and psychotherapy. The second goal is to collate extant work on feedback and advance ideas for adaptive feedback systems that have potential to influence coordination in a way that can enhance the effectiveness of team interactions. In addressing these two goals, this work lays the foundation as well as plans for the future of human-autonomy teams that augment team interactions using coordination-based measures.
Keywords: Complex systems; Dynamics; Feedback; Human–machine interaction; Phase transitions; Teams.
© 2022 The Authors. Topics in Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society.
Similar articles
-
Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 May;78(5 Suppl):B63-70. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007. PMID: 17547306 Review.
-
Numerical relations and skill level constrain co-adaptive behaviors of agents in sports teams.PLoS One. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):e107112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107112. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25191870 Free PMC article.
-
Team coordination dynamics.Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010 Jul;14(3):265-89. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010. PMID: 20587302
-
Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming.Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):262-273. doi: 10.1177/0018720817743223. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Hum Factors. 2018. PMID: 29185818
-
Reflexivity in Teams: A Review and New Perspectives.J Psychol. 2016;150(2):153-74. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977. Epub 2015 Oct 12. J Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26457836 Review.
Cited by
-
Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 17;12:1487883. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883. eCollection 2025. Front Robot AI. 2025. PMID: 40034799 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abney, D. H., Paxton, A., Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2014). Complexity matching in dyadic conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (6):2304–2315.
-
- Abney, D. H., Paxton, A., Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2015). Movement dynamics reflect a functional role for weak coupling and role structure in dyadic problem solving. Cognitive Processing, 16(4), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339‐015‐0648‐2
-
- Aguado, L., Fernández‐Cahill, M., Román, F. J., Blanco, I., & de Echegaray, J. (2016). Evaluative and psychophysiological responses to short film clips of different emotional content. Journal of Psychophysiology, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269‐8803/a000180
-
- Ahonen, L., Cowley, B., Torniainen, J., Ukkonen, A., Vihavainen, A., & Puolamäki, K. (2016). Cognitive collaboration found in cardiac physiology: Study in classroom environment. PLoS One, 11(7). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159178
-
- Amazeen, P. G. (2018). From physics to social interactions: Scientific unification via dynamics. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.033
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources