Prehospital activation of a coordinated multidisciplinary hospital response in preparation for patients with severe hemorrhage: A statewide data linkage study of the New South Wales "Code Crimson" pathway
- PMID: 35261372
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003585
Prehospital activation of a coordinated multidisciplinary hospital response in preparation for patients with severe hemorrhage: A statewide data linkage study of the New South Wales "Code Crimson" pathway
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death in trauma. Prehospital medical teams can streamline access to massive transfusion and definitive hemorrhage control by alerting in-hospital trauma teams of suspected life-threatening bleeding in unstable patients. This study reports the initial experience of an Australian "Code Crimson" (CC) pathway facilitating early multidisciplinary care for these patients.
Methods: This data-linkage study combined prehospital databases with a trauma registry of patients with an Injury Severity Score greater than 12 between 2017 and 2019. Four groups were created; prehospital CC activation with and without in-hospital links and patients with inpatient treatment consistent with CC, without one being activated. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated using capture-recapture methodology to replace the missing cell (no prehospital CC and Injury Severity Score < 12).
Results: Of 72 prehospital CC patients, 50 were linked with hospital data. Of 154 potentially missed patients, 42 had a prehospital link. Most CC patients were young men who sustained blunt trauma and required more prehospital interventions than non-CC patients. Code Crimson patients had more multisystem trauma, especially complex thoracic injuries (80%), while missed CC patients more frequently had single organ injuries (59%). Code Crimson patients required fewer hemorrhage control procedures (60% vs. 86%). Lower mortality was observed in CC patients despite greater hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Despite a low sensitivity (0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.61) and good specificity (0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96), the positive likelihood ratio was acceptable (6.42; 95% CI, 3.30-12.48).
Conclusion: The initiation of a statewide CC process was highly specific for the need for hemorrhage control intervention in hospital, but further work is required to improve the sensitivity of prehospital activation. Patients who had a CC activation sustained more multisystem trauma but had lower mortality than those who did not. These results guide measures to improve this pathway.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Catchy code names in trauma care cannot replace surgical decision-making.ANZ J Surg. 2023 Apr;93(4):802-803. doi: 10.1111/ans.18433. ANZ J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37052056 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Process measure aimed at reducing time to haemorrhage control: outcomes associated with Code Crimson activation in exsanguinating truncal trauma.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):481-485. doi: 10.1111/ans.15650. Epub 2020 Feb 11. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32048430
-
Prediction of massive bleeding in a prehospital setting: validation of six scoring systems.Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr;43(3):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Feb 4. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019. PMID: 29415812 English, Spanish.
-
Shock index and pulse pressure as triggers for massive transfusion.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1S Suppl 1):S159-S164. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002333. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019. PMID: 31246921
-
What is the impact of prehospital blood product administration for patients with catastrophic haemorrhage: an integrative review.Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.049. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Injury. 2019. PMID: 30578085
-
Predictors of Transfusion in Trauma and Their Utility in the Prehospital Environment: A Scoping Review.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):575-585. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2120935. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023. PMID: 36066217
Cited by
-
Data-driven identification of urgent surgical procedures for use in trauma outcomes measurement.Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 May 21;10(2):e001783. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001783. eCollection 2025. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025. PMID: 40406235 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Prehospital Intensive Care Units in Emergencies-A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;11(21):2892. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212892. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37958036 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Curtis K, Caldwell E, Delprado A, Munroe B. Traumatic injury in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Emerg Nurs J . 2012;15(1):45–54.
-
- Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma . 2006;60(Suppl 6):S3–S11.
-
- Curry N, Hopewell S, Dorée C, Hyde C, Brohi K, Stanworth S. The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care . 2011;15(2):R92.
-
- Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, Brown C, Salim A, Rhee P, Browder T, Noguchi TT, Demetriades D. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma . 2007;63(6):1338–1346.
-
- Tien HC, Spencer F, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB, Brenneman FD. Preventable deaths from hemorrhage at a level I Canadian trauma center. J Trauma . 2007;62(1):142–146.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials