Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;52(12):14246-14280.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03344-3. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

Machine learning techniques applied to mechanical fault diagnosis and fault prognosis in the context of real industrial manufacturing use-cases: a systematic literature review

Affiliations

Machine learning techniques applied to mechanical fault diagnosis and fault prognosis in the context of real industrial manufacturing use-cases: a systematic literature review

Marta Fernandes et al. Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022.

Abstract

When put into practice in the real world, predictive maintenance presents a set of challenges for fault detection and prognosis that are often overlooked in studies validated with data from controlled experiments, or numeric simulations. For this reason, this study aims to review the recent advancements in mechanical fault diagnosis and fault prognosis in the manufacturing industry using machine learning methods. For this systematic review, we searched Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, and IEEE Xplore between January 2015 and October 2021. Full-length studies that employed machine learning algorithms to perform mechanical fault detection or fault prognosis in manufacturing equipment and presented empirical results obtained from industrial case-studies were included, except for studies not written in English or published in sources other than peer-reviewed journals with JCR Impact Factor, conference proceedings and book chapters/sections. Of 4549 records, 44 primary studies were selected. In 37 of those studies, fault diagnosis and prognosis were performed using artificial neural networks (n = 12), decision tree methods (n = 11), hybrid models (n = 8), or latent variable models (n = 6), with one of the studies employing two different types of techniques independently. The remaining studies employed a variety of machine learning techniques, ranging from rule-based models to partition-based algorithms, and only two studies approached the problem using online learning methods. The main advantages of these algorithms include high performance, the ability to uncover complex nonlinear relationships and computational efficiency, while the most important limitation is the reduction in model performance in the presence of concept drift. This review shows that, although the number of studies performed in the manufacturing industry has been increasing in recent years, additional research is necessary to address the challenges presented by real-world scenarios.

Keywords: Fault detection; Fault prognosis; Industrial case-study; Machine learning; Manufacturing industry; Predictive maintenance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of selected publications per year
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Share of publications by country
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of publications in conferences and journals
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Number of publications per category of machine learning algorithms
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Types of learning tasks considered in the selected studies
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Publications in conferences and journals across the years
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Publications in conferences and journals for the top 3 countries
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Proportion of studies published per year by the top 3 scientific fields

References

    1. Aboelmaged MG. Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. Int J Inf Manag. 2014;34(5):639–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002. - DOI
    1. Holmberg K, Adgar A, Arnaiz A, Jantunen E, Mascolo J (2010). In: Holmberg K, Adgar A, Arnaiz A, Jantunen E, Mascolo J, Mekid S (eds) E-maintenance. Springer, London
    1. Muller A, Crespo Marquez A, Iung B. On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2008;93(8):1165–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.08.006. - DOI
    1. Mobley R K (2001) Predictive Maintenance. In: Plant Engineer’s Handbook. Elsevier, pp 867–888
    1. Sullivan G, Pugh R, Melendez A P, Hunt WD (2010) Operations & maintenance best practices-a guide to achieving operational efficiency (release 3). Technical Report, Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland

LinkOut - more resources