The Management of Perineal Trauma in Children
- PMID: 35261516
- PMCID: PMC8853604
- DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_322_20
The Management of Perineal Trauma in Children
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of perineal trauma in children and to a define protocol for their management.
Methods: It is a retrospective study of children who presented with perineal injury between August 2012 and December 2020. The patients were classified into three groups: Group-1 included children with perineal and genitourinary injuries; Group-2 included patients with perineal and anorectal injuries; and Group-3 included patients with perineal, genitourinary, and anorectal injuries. All patients underwent primary repair. Those with full-thickness anorectal injury underwent an additional covering colostomy, while urethral disruption was initially managed by a diverting suprapubic cystostomy (SPC).
Results: A total of 41 patients were studied. Impalement injury (n = 11; 27%) and sexual abuse (n = 11; 27%) were the most common mechanisms of injury. Twenty (49%) patients had anorectal injuries with 10 (24%) each of partial-thickness and full-thickness injury. There were 24 (59%) genital injuries and five (12%) urethral injuries. One patient each developed anal and vaginal stenosis, both were managed with dilatation. One patient developed a rectovaginal fistula repaired surgically at a later date.
Conclusion: Perineal injuries with resultant anorectal or genital damage require a careful primary survey. Following stabilization, an examination under anesthesia as a set protocol will help determine the treatment strategy. A colostomy is essential in the acute management of severe anorectal injuries to reduce local complications and preserve continence. Urethral injuries may warrant an initial diverting SPC in selected cases.
Keywords: Anorectal injuries; colostomy; examination under anesthesia; pediatric perineal trauma; sexual abuse; urogenital injuries.
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Hashish AA. Perineal trauma in children: A standardized management approach. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2011;7:55–60. [doi: 10.1097/01.XPS.0000397972.74930.a2]
-
- Bakal U, Sarac M, Tartar T, Cigsar EB, Kazez A. Twenty years of experience with perineal injury in children. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:599–603. - PubMed
-
- Oztürk H, Onen A, Dokucu AI, Otçu S, Yağmur Y, Yucesan S. Management of anorectal injuries in children: aN eighteen-year experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003;13:249–55. - PubMed
-
- Leaphart CL, Danko M, Cassidy L, Gaines B, Hackam DJ. An analysis of proctoscopy vs. computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis of rectal injuries in children: Which is better? J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:700–3. - PubMed
-
- Samuk I, Steiner Z, Feigin E, Baazov A, Dlugy E, Freud E. Anorectal injuries in children: A 20-year experience in two centers. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31:815–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources