Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Mar 1;10(3):e05504.
doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5504. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Implant-supported bar overdentures in patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer: Two case reports

Affiliations
Case Reports

Implant-supported bar overdentures in patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer: Two case reports

Nadine Omeish et al. Clin Case Rep. .

Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients who have undergone head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery could be very challenging. The aim of this article is to present two HNC clinical cases rehabilitated with implant-supported removable complete dental prosthesis with different types of CB.

Keywords: connecting bar; dental implants; head and neck cancer; implant‐supported prosthesis; overdentures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Inital situation showing the limited mouth opening
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Initial OPT before the implants surgery
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Customized resin acrylic trey divided in two parts. Pink acrylic resin studs were added on the base to ensure the repositioning of the different parts of the trey. (B) Secondary mandibular impression. The acrylic resin key was positioned during molding and impression to ensure the perfect positioning of the two parts of the trey. (C) Secondary mandibular impression
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Maxillary impression using light body silicone around copings cervical edges and plaster type 2 around the occlusal edges
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Ackermann connecting bar
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Radiographic checking of the bar adaptation. OPT was done due to the limited mouth opening
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Final prosthesis
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Patient's smile
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Connecting bars and their respective cross‐section
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Infiltrating squamous cell carcinoma in the anterior lingual floor
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 11
Initial radiography before surgery
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 12
Decision tree for implant‐supported prosthesis and selection of implant number; The minus sign in “oral hygiene” refers to a poor oral hygiene, whereas the plus sign refers to an adequate oral hygiene. The minus sign in “cost” refers to “expensive,” and the plus sign refers to “affordable by the patient”
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 13
Mandibula 10 months after initial surgery
FIGURE 14
FIGURE 14
Customized screwdriver. Dental floss was wrapped around the screwdriver to prevent any swallowing incident
FIGURE 15
FIGURE 15
Hader connecting bar
FIGURE 16
FIGURE 16
Radiographic checking of the bar adaptation
FIGURE 17
FIGURE 17
Counter bar of the hader bar
FIGURE 18
FIGURE 18
Final prosthesis
FIGURE 19
FIGURE 19
Patient's smile

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tolentino Ede S, Centurion BS, Ferreira LHC, Souza AP de, Damante JH, Rubira‐Bullen IRF. Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: literature review and suggestion of a clinical oral care guideline for irradiated patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):448‐454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attia S, Wiltfang J, Pons‐Kühnemann J, et al. Survival of dental implants placed in vascularised fibula free flaps after jaw reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(8):1205‐1210. - PubMed
    1. Vecchiatini R, Mobilio N, Barbin D, Catapano S, Calura G. Milled bar‐supported implant overdenture after mandibular resection: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(5):216‐220. - PubMed
    1. Sharma S, Makkar M, Teja SS, Singh P. Implant supported overdenture: a review. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2017;7(7):270‐277. Disponible sur: http://lawarencepress.com/ojs/index.php/JPBMS/article/view/454
    1. ELsyad M, Emera R, Ashmawy T. Effect of different bar designs on axial and nonaxial retention forces of implant‐retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):31‐38. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources