Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 9;24(3):e28942.
doi: 10.2196/28942.

Education on Depression in Mental Health Apps: Systematic Assessment of Characteristics and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines

Affiliations
Review

Education on Depression in Mental Health Apps: Systematic Assessment of Characteristics and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines

Laura Martinengo et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal understanding of depression and mental health disorders by the general population is an important contributor to the wide treatment gap in depression. Mental health literacy encompasses knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders and supports their recognition, management, and prevention. Besides knowledge improvement, psychoeducational interventions reduce symptoms of depression, enhance help-seeking behavior, and decrease stigma. Mental health apps often offer educational content, but the trustworthiness of the included information is unclear.

Objective: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate adherence to clinical guidelines on depression of the information offered by mental health apps available in major commercial app stores.

Methods: A systematic assessment of the educational content regarding depression in the apps available in the Apple App Store and Google Play was conducted in July 2020. A systematic search for apps published or updated since January 2019 was performed using 42matters. Apps meeting the inclusion criteria were downloaded and assessed using two smartphones: an iPhone 7 (iOS version 14.0.1) and a Sony XPERIA XZs (Android version 8.0.0). The 156-question assessment checklist comprised general characteristics of apps, appraisal of 38 educational topics and their adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines, as well as technical aspects and quality assurance. The results were tabulated and reported as a narrative review, using descriptive statistics.

Results: The app search retrieved 2218 apps, of which 58 were included in the analysis (Android apps: n=29, 50%; iOS apps: n=29, 50%). Of the 58 included apps, 37 (64%) apps offered educational content within a more comprehensive depression or mental health management app. Moreover, 21% (12/58) of apps provided non-evidence-based information. Furthermore, 88% (51/58) of apps included up to 20 of the educational topics, the common ones being listing the symptoms of depression (52/58, 90%) and available treatments (48/58, 83%), particularly psychotherapy. Depression-associated stigma was mentioned by 38% (22/58) of the apps, whereas suicide risk was mentioned by 71% (41/58), generally as an item in a list of symptoms. Of the 58 included apps, 44 (76%) highlighted the importance of help seeking, 29 (50%) emphasized the importance of involving the user's support network. In addition, 52% (30/58) of apps referenced their content, and 17% (10/58) included advertisements.

Conclusions: Information in mental health and depression apps is often brief and incomplete, with 1 in 5 apps providing non-evidence-based information. Given the unmet needs and stigma associated with the disease, it is imperative that apps seize the opportunity to offer quality, evidence-based education or point the users to relevant resources. A multistakeholder consensus on a more stringent development and publication process for mental health apps is essential.

Keywords: apps; depression; health literacy; mHealth; mental health literacy; mobile apps; mobile phone; self-management; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JL has received honoraria from Otsuka and Janssen. There are no other conflicts of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
App selection flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):858–66. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/15640922 S0042-96862004001100011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luitel NP, Jordans MJ, Kohrt BA, Rathod SD, Komproe IH. Treatment gap and barriers for mental health care: a cross-sectional community survey in Nepal. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183223. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183223 PONE-D-17-00808 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. König H, König H-H, Konnopka A. The excess costs of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr 05;29:e30. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000180. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30947759 S2045796019000180 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jorm AF. Mental health literacy: empowering the community to take action for better mental health. Am Psychol. 2012 Apr;67(3):231–43. doi: 10.1037/a0025957.2011-24866-001 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types