Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 9;9(1):e34918.
doi: 10.2196/34918.

Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study

Affiliations

Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study

Patrik Schretzlmaier et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the use of mobile health (mHealth) apps to manage chronic diseases has increased significantly. Although mHealth apps have many benefits, their acceptance is still low in certain areas and groups. Most mHealth acceptance studies are based on technology acceptance models. In particular, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) model was developed to predict technology acceptance in a consumer context. However, to date, only a few studies have used the UTAUT2 model to predict mHealth acceptance and confirm its suitability for the health sector. Thus, it is unclear whether the UTAUT2 model is suitable for predicting mHealth acceptance and whether essential variables for a health-related context are missing.

Objective: This study aims to validate the suitability of UTAUT2 for predicting mHealth acceptance.

Methods: In this study, diabetes was used as an example as mHealth apps are a significant element of diabetes self-management. In addition, diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases affecting young and older people worldwide. An explorative literature review and guided interviews with 11 mHealth or technology acceptance experts and 8 mHealth users in Austria and Germany were triangulated to identify all relevant constructs for predicting mHealth acceptance. The interview participants were recruited by purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were analyzed using structured content analysis based on inductive and deductive approaches.

Results: This study was able to confirm the relevance of all exogenous UTAUT2 constructs. However, it revealed two additional constructs that may also need to be considered to better predict mHealth acceptance: trust and perceived disease threat.

Conclusions: This study showed that the UTAUT2 model is suitable for predicting mHealth acceptance. However, the model should be extended to include 2 additional constructs for use in the mHealth context.

Keywords: UTAUT2; diabetes mellitus; mHealth; mobile apps; mobile health; mobile phone; technology acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 model, adapted from a study by Venkatesh et al [26].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Research design. mHealth: mobile health.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Explorative literature review—the screening process.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of combined categories (colored boxes) identified from explorative literature review and guided interviews (gray boxes). The figures between gray and colored boxes indicate the number of coded segments assigned to each category. Categories are arranged in decreasing order according to the sum of coded segments from both sources. mHealth: mobile health.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global Report on Diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Hood M, Wilson R, Corsica J, Bradley L, Chirinos D, Vivo A. What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews. J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):981–94. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3.10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2968. http://www.jmir.org/2014/4/e104/ v16i4e104 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cappon G, Vettoretti M, Sparacino G, Facchinetti A. Continuous glucose monitoring sensors for diabetes management: a review of technologies and applications. Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Aug;43(4):383–97. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0121. https://e-dmj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4093/dmj.2019.0121 43.383 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeffrey B, Bagala M, Creighton A, Leavey T, Nicholls S, Wood C, Longman J, Barker J, Pit S. Mobile phone applications and their use in the self-management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a qualitative study among app users and non-app users. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:84. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0480-4. https://dmsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13098-019-0480-4 480 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources