Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disturbances in Emergency High-Risk Abdominal Surgery, a Retrospective Study
- PMID: 35262790
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06499-9
Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disturbances in Emergency High-Risk Abdominal Surgery, a Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing emergency high-risk abdominal surgery potentially suffer from both systemic dehydration and hypovolaemia. Data on the prevalence and clinical impact of electrolyte disturbances in this patient group, specifically the differences in patients with intestinal obstruction (IO) versus perforated viscus (PV) are lacking.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing emergency high-risk abdominal surgery in a standardized perioperative pathway were included in this retrospective single-center cohort study. Electrolytes and arterial blood gas analysis were measured during the early perioperative period. Prevalence and clinical impact of electrolyte disturbances were assessed.
Results: A total of 354 patients were included in the study. Preoperative alkalemia dominated preoperatively, significantly more prevalent in IO (45 vs. 32%, p < .001), while acidosis was most pronounced postoperatively in PV (49 vs. 28%, p < .0001). Preoperative hypochloraemia and hypokalemia were more frequent in the IO (34 vs. 20% and 37 vs. 25%, respectively). Hyponatremia was highly prevalent in both IO and PV. Pre- and postoperative hypochloremia were independently associated with 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with IO (OR 2.87 (1.35, 6.23) p = 0.006, OR 6.86 (1.71, 32.2) p = 0.009, respectively). Hypochloremic patients presented with reduced long-term survival as compared with the normo- and hyperchloremic patients (p < 0.05). Neither plasma sodium nor potassium showed a significant association with outcome.
Conclusion: These observations suggest that acute high-risk abdominal patients have frequent preoperative alkalosis shifting to postoperative acidosis. Both pre- and postoperative hypochloremia were independently associated with both impaired short- and long-term outcome in patients with intestinal obstruction, with potential implications for the choice of resuscitations fluids.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
References
-
- Myburgh JA (2015) Fluid resuscitation in acute medicine: what is the current situation? J Intern Med 277:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12326 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Finfer S, Liu B, Taylor C et al (2010) Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units. Crit Care 14:R185. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9293 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Poulton T, Murray D, National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) project team (2019) Pre-optimisation of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a review of best practice. Anaesthesia 74(Suppl 1):100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14514 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tengberg LT, Cihoric M, Foss NB et al (2017) Complications after emergency laparotomy beyond the immediate postoperative period—a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1139 patients. Anaesthesia 72:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13721 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Klek S, Forbes A, Gabe S et al (2016) Management of acute intestinal failure: a position paper from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Special Interest Group. Clin Nutr 35:1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.009 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources