Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):2036-2047.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02108. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

TRACEBACK: Testing of Historical Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Patients for Hereditary Risk Genes as a Cancer Prevention Strategy in Family Members

Rachel Delahunty  1   2 Linh Nguyen  1   2 Stuart Craig  1 Belinda Creighton  3 Dinuka Ariyaratne  1 Dale W Garsed  1   2 Elizabeth Christie  1   2 Sian Fereday  1   2 Lesley Andrews  4   5 Alexandra Lewis  6 Sharne Limb  2   6 Ahwan Pandey  1 Joy Hendley  1 Nadia Traficante  1   2 Natalia Carvajal  1 Amanda B Spurdle  7 Bryony Thompson  8   9 Michael T Parsons  7 Victoria Beshay  1 Mila Volcheck  1   10   11 Timothy Semple  1 Richard Lupat  1 Kenneth Doig  1   2 Jiaan Yu  1 Xiao Qing Chen  7 Anna Marsh  7 Christopher Love  1 Sanela Bilic  12 Maria Beilin  12 Cassandra B Nichols  13 Christina Greer  13 Yeh Chen Lee  4   5   14 Susan Gerty  4 Lynette Gill  4 Emma Newton  4 Julie Howard  4 Rachel Williams  14   15 Christie Norris  4 Andrew N Stephens  16   17   18 Erin Tutty  6 Courtney Smyth  19 Shona O'Connell  19 Thomas Jobling  20 Colin J R Stewart  21 Adeline Tan  22 Stephen B Fox  1   2 Nicholas Pachter  13   23   24 Jason Li  1   2 Jason Ellul  1   2 Gisela Mir Arnau  1   2 Mary-Anne Young  25 Louisa Gordon  7   26 Laura Forrest  1   2 Marion Harris  20 Karen Livingstone  27 Jane Hill  3 Georgia Chenevix-Trench  7 Paul A Cohen  12   28 Penelope M Webb  7 Michael Friedlander  4   5   13 Paul James  1   2 David Bowtell  1   2 Kathryn Alsop  1   2 Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle Study and the TRACEBACK Study
Affiliations

TRACEBACK: Testing of Historical Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Patients for Hereditary Risk Genes as a Cancer Prevention Strategy in Family Members

Rachel Delahunty et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Tubo-ovarian cancer (TOC) is a sentinel cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs). Identification of a PV in the first member of a family at increased genetic risk (the proband) provides opportunities for cancer prevention in other at-risk family members. Although Australian testing rates are now high, PVs in patients with TOC whose diagnosis predated revised testing guidelines might have been missed. We assessed the feasibility of detecting PVs in this population to enable genetic risk reduction in relatives.

Patients and methods: In this pilot study, deceased probands were ascertained from research cohort studies, identification by a relative, and gynecologic oncology clinics. DNA was extracted from archival tissue or stored blood for panel sequencing of 10 risk-associated genes. Testing of deceased probands ascertained through clinic records was performed with a consent waiver.

Results: We identified 85 PVs in 84 of 787 (11%) probands. Familial contacts of 39 of 60 (65%) deceased probands with an identified recipient (60 of 84; 71%) have received a written notification of results, with follow-up verbal contact made in 85% (33 of 39). A minority of families (n = 4) were already aware of the PV. For many (29 of 33; 88%), the genetic result provided new information and referral to a genetic service was accepted in most cases (66%; 19 of 29). Those who declined referral (4 of 29) were all male next of kin whose family member had died more than 10 years before.

Conclusion: We overcame ethical and logistic challenges to demonstrate that retrospective genetic testing to identify PVs in previously untested deceased probands with TOC is feasible. Understanding reasons for a family member's decision to accept or decline a referral will be important for guiding future TRACEBACK projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Belinda CreightonEmployment: Cancer Specialists 1/84 Bridge Rd, Richmond VIC 3121 AustraliaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai Dinuka AriyaratneResearch Funding: AstraZeneca Elizabeth ChristieHonoraria: AstraZeneca Sian FeredayConsulting or Advisory Role: Geneseq Biosciences Pty LtdResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst) Nadia TraficanteResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst) Bryony ThompsonConsulting or Advisory Role: Genetic Technologies Kenneth DoigStock and Other Ownership Interests: CSL Limited Christopher LoveEmployment: Geneseq Biosciences Yeh Chen LeeConsulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKlineResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Rachel WilliamsHonoraria: AstraZeneca Andrew N. StephensConsulting or Advisory Role: Invion Pty Ltd (Inst)Research Funding: Invion Pty Ltd (Inst) Adeline TanEmployment: Sonic HealthcareStock and Other Ownership Interests: Sonic Healthcare Stephen B. FoxConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (Inst), BMS (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), MSD (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst)Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Roche (Inst), BMS (Inst)Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca (Inst), MSD (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ventana Medical Systems, AstraZeneca, MSD Mary-Anne YoungUncompensated Relationships: Illumina (Inst) Jane HillOther Relationship: Medicines Australia Paul A. CohenEmployment: St John of God HealthcareStock and Other Ownership Interests: Clinic IQHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Clinic IQResearch Funding: ANZGOG, St John of God Foundation Penelope M. WebbResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst) Michael FriedlanderHonoraria: AstraZeneca, MSD, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, AbbVie, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKlineSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, ACT GenomicsResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca David BowtellHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Exo TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, BeiGenePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: AstraZeneca Genentech Roche Kathryn AlsopResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
TRACEBACK probands and samples. Schematic representation of the three ascertainment methods used to identify and test high-grade nonmucinous ovarian cancer probands, diagnosed in Australia between the years 2000 and 2016. Genetic testing of deceased probands (n = 824) is reported here, with information available for the living probands ascertained to the study (n = 265) in the Data Supplement. aSome exceptions were made for deceased probands diagnosed outside 2000-2016 for NOK referral (Data Supplement). bPredominately normal tissue was obtained from surgical tumor samples and included both FFPE and fresh-frozen biospecimens (Data Supplement). FFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; HGNMOC, high-grade nonmucinous ovarian cancer; NOK-R, Next of Kin–referred; QC, quality control.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Detected C4/C5 variants (PVs). An overview of the clinical and genomic features of 84 of 787 (11%) deceased probands with PVs, including one proband with two PVs, both in BRCA2 (one frameshift and one nonsense [given in a]). ACS, Australian Cancer Study; AOCS, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study; Carcinoma NOS, Carcinoma not otherwise specified; FFPE, Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; HGEn, High-Grade Endometrioid; HGNMOC, high-grade nonmucinous ovarian cancer; HGS, High-Grade Serous; NOK-R, Next of Kin–referred; Opal, Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle Study; PV, pathogenic variant.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Frequency of PVs in the 787 deceased probands stratified by (A) method of ascertainment, (B) age at diagnosis, and (C) years of diagnosis. Group differences for categorical variables were examined using the chi-square test (GraphPad Prism 8.4 for Windows). ACS, Australian Cancer Study; AOCS, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study; NOK-R, Next of Kin–referred; OPAL, Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle Study; PV, pathogenic variant.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Identification of recipients for research results. A stepwise representation of the feedback of PVs to date: (A) outcome of the feedback process to the NOK of deceased probands who self-referred into the study and (B) outcome for feedback to 77 NOKs of deceased probands ascertained via clinic-based recruitment and existing research studies. Created using BioRender. GC, Genetic clinician; NOK-R, next of kin–referred; PV, pathogenic variant.

Comment in

References

    1. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. : Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317:2402-2416, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Song H, Dicks E, Ramus SJ, et al. : Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J Clin Oncol 33:2901-2907, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rafnar T, Gudbjartsson DF, Sulem P, et al. : Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 43:1104-1107, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Leslie G, Doroszuk A, et al. : Cancer risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants: An international study of 524 families. J Clin Oncol 38:674-685, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson P, Vasen HFA, Mecklin JP, et al. : The risk of extra-colonic, extra-endometrial cancer in the Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer 123:444-449, 2008 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types