Drivers of and Barriers to Adherence to Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment Management Plans: A Multi-National Qualitative Study
- PMID: 35264847
- PMCID: PMC8901255
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S347713
Drivers of and Barriers to Adherence to Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment Management Plans: A Multi-National Qualitative Study
Abstract
Purpose: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with intravitreally injected anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapies achieve lower vision improvements compared with patients in clinical trials. This qualitative research study aimed to better understand the real-world anti-VEGF treatment experience from nAMD and DME patients', caregivers', and retina specialists' perspectives.
Methods: One-time, semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted with adult patients with nAMD or DME treated with anti-VEGF injections for ≥12 months, their caregivers, and experienced retina specialists. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using a thematic analysis approach.
Results: A total of 49 nAMD and 46 DME patients, 47 nAMD and 33 DME caregivers, and 62 retina specialists were interviewed in the USA, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Most (79%) patients and caregivers reported disruptions to their routine on the day before, the day of, or the day after anti-VEGF injection. Seven nAMD patients (14%) and 14 DME patients (30%) reported having missed an injection visit. The most frequently reported driver for adherence for patients was the doctor-patient relationship (n=66, 70%), whereas for caregivers, it was the ease of booking an appointment (n=25, 32%). Retina specialists reported patient education on the treatment (n=28, 45%) as the most important driver. Treatment barriers could be grouped into four categories: tolerability, clinical factors, logistical parameters and human factors. The most frequently reported barrier to adherence for patients and caregivers was related to side effects (pain/discomfort/irritation: n=63, 67% of patients; n=52, 66% of caregivers), whereas for retina specialists it was logistical parameters (travel logistics: n=44, 71%).
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of the doctor-patient relationship and patient education as key drivers, and treatment tolerability and logistics as key barriers to treatment adherence. Improved doctor-patient relationship/communication and patient education together with new therapies offering convenience, long-acting effectiveness, and better tolerability may improve treatment adherence.
Keywords: adherence; diabetic macular edema; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; qualitative interviews; treatment experience.
© 2022 Giocanti-Aurégan et al.
Conflict of interest statement
SL, CEK, JL, and HBL, were full time employees of ICON plc at the time this work was conducted. AGA is consultant for and reports personal fees from AbbVie, Alcon, Allergan, Bayer, Horus, Novartis, and Roche. AGL is consultant for and report personal fees from Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, and Thea. TP reports consultant fees from Roche/Genentech, Inc., Bayer, Novartis, Alimera, Heidelberg, Oxurion, Apellis. BG and GCC are employees of Genentech, Inc. MM is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. NMH reports consulting fees from Adverum, Allergan, Annexon, Apellis, Bayer, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Clearside Biosciences, Gemini, Genentech, Gyroscope, Katalyst Surgical, Nacuity, Notal Vision, Novartis, Polyactiva, Regeneron, Stealth Biosciences; has been a member of Speakers Bureau for Allergan, Genentech, Novartis, Regeneron, and Spark; conducted contracted research for Genentech, Gemini, Gyroscope, Notal Vision; and holds intellectual property/patents: Katalyst Surgical. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Caregiver Experience Survey of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmic Res. 2024;67(1):516-527. doi: 10.1159/000540390. Epub 2024 Aug 29. Ophthalmic Res. 2024. PMID: 39208778
-
Maintaining driving vision after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with neovascular AMD and diabetic macular edema: a plain language summary of publication.Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 30;17:25158414241310274. doi: 10.1177/25158414241310274. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40166602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Patient Voice in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Findings from a Qualitative Study.Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):561-575. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00631-7. Epub 2022 Dec 16. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023. PMID: 36525220 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Preferences Associated with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema.Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 1;14:2975-2982. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273564. eCollection 2020. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33061283 Free PMC article.
-
Conbercept for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema or Pathologic Myopia Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 12;12:696201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.696201. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34712132 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rationale and Design of VOYAGER: Long-term Outcomes of Faricimab and Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice.Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Dec 3;4(3):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100442. eCollection 2024 May-Jun. Ophthalmol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38304609 Free PMC article.
-
Global Insights from Patients, Providers, and Staff on Challenges and Solutions in Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):211-228. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01061-3. Epub 2024 Dec 14. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025. PMID: 39673040 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of Retinal Diseases: Can Biosimilars Add Value? A Narrative Review.Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Apr;14(4):621-641. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01104-3. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025. PMID: 40009268 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Switching to faricimab from the current anti-VEGF therapy: evidence-based expert recommendations.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 16;10(1):e001967. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001967. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39824523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring challenges to nutrition intervention adherence using COM-B model among patients with wet age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 29;12(11):e064892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064892. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36446464 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holekamp NM. Review of neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment options. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(10 Suppl):S172–s181. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources