Ploidy Testing of Blastocoel Fluid for Screening May Be Technically Challenging and More Invasive Than That of Spent Cell Culture Media
- PMID: 35264976
- PMCID: PMC8900197
- DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.794210
Ploidy Testing of Blastocoel Fluid for Screening May Be Technically Challenging and More Invasive Than That of Spent Cell Culture Media
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that both blastocoel fluid (BF) and spent cell culture media (SCM) have potential as materials for non-invasive or less-invasive pre-implantation genetic analysis. BF may allow more opportunity to obtain cell-free DNA from the inner cell mass (ICM), and it has a lower risk of containing contaminant DNA from cumulus cells, sperm and culture media. There are no data regarding the ICM as a gold standard to evaluate the chromosome constitution of BF or SCM for embryo liquid biopsy.
Methods: Two hundred eighteen donated human blastocysts were warmed and cultured in blastocyst culture media for 18-24 h. The corresponding SCM was collected, and only clear ICM was biopsied in blastocysts; otherwise, the whole blastocyst (WB) was biopsied. Quantitative PCR was performed to determine the DNA levels in the SCM and BF before and after amplification. ChromInst was used to amplify BF/SCM and blastocyst DNA before sequencing. Chromosomal copy number variation (CNV) was investigated to evaluate the chromosome constitution.
Results: In total, 212 blastocysts were available for SCM and BF collection. The technical success rates (next-generation sequencing data) were 100 and 69.8% (148/212) for SCM and BF, respectively. Among the 148 blastocysts with both SCM and BF data, 101 were euploid and 47 were aneuploid based on ICM (n = 89) or WB (n = 59) analysis as the gold standard. Among all blastocysts, SCM was comparable to BF [specificity: 80.2 versus 61.4% (P = 0.005, χ2 test); sensitivity: 91.5 versus 87.2% (P = 0.738, χ2 test); negative predictive value (NPV): 95.3 versus 91.2% (P = 0.487, χ2 test); positive predictive value (PPV): 68.3% versus 51.3% (P = 0.042, χ2 test)]. The SCM and BF samples were 83.8% (124/148) and 69.6% (103/148) concordant with the corresponding ICM/WB samples when only two categories, euploid or aneuploid/mosaic, were grouped to calculate the concordance.
Conclusions: Compared with BF, SCM has superior diagnostic performance, and it is non-invasive for embryos.
Clinical trial registration: [http://www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR-BPD-17014087].
Keywords: blastocoel fluid; embryos; inner cell mass; pre-implantation genetic testing of aneuploidies; spent culture medium.
Copyright © 2022 Shi, Zhao, Xue, Li, Yao, Wang, Wang, Lu and Shi.
Conflict of interest statement
YY, JW, and SL were employed by Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40069837 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2020-2034. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab080. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33974705
-
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 31774124 Review.
-
Comparison of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Using Samples Derived from the Same Embryo Culture.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):33. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010033. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797117 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of preimplantation genetic tests for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with DNA from spent culture media (SCM): concordance assessment and implication.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Mar 6;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00714-3. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 33673853 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40069837 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 9;13(8):2160. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082160. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38673433 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of non-invasive gene detection in preimplantation embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02760-9. Epub 2023 Mar 23. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 36952146 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical application of noninvasive chromosomal screening for elective single-blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles.J Transl Med. 2022 Dec 3;20(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03640-z. J Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36463184 Free PMC article.
-
The use of voting ensembles to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to predict embryo ploidy status.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):301-308. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02707-6. Epub 2023 Jan 14. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 36640251 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Capalbo A., Wright G., Elliott T., Ubaldi F. M., Rienzi L., Nagy Z. P. (2013). FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum. Reprod. 28 2298–2307. 10.1093/humrep/det245 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feichtinger M., Vaccari E., Carli L., Wallner E., Mädel U., Figl K., et al. (2017). Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reproductive Biomed. Online 34 583–589. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.015 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous