Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28:2022:7335960.
doi: 10.1155/2022/7335960. eCollection 2022.

ERAS vs. Traditional Protocol in Patients Who Had Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 182 Cases

Ahmet Semih Guleser  1 , Yasar Basaga  2
Affiliations

ERAS vs. Traditional Protocol in Patients Who Had Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 182 Cases

Ahmet Semih Guleser et al. Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of ERAS protocol application on hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use, and gastrointestinal recovery time in radical cystectomy patients with ileal conduit.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 182 patients (112 traditional vs. 72 ERAS) who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit between November 2017 and December 2020. Patients were compared in terms of time to start enteral feeding (SEF), length of hospital stay (LOS), time to first stool, duration of postoperative intravenous antibiotic use, postoperative ileus rate, and serum albumin levels.

Results: The traditional and ERAS groups contained 112 and 72 patients, respectively. LOS (14.79 ± 6.44 vs. 10.44 ± 4.64 days, p=0.003), first stool time (4.43 ± 2.39 vs. 2.89 ± 1.81 days, p=0.011), and duration of postoperative intravenous antibiotic use (8.79 ± 5.17 vs. 4.61 ± 4.90, p=0.004) were to be found significantly shorter in the ERAS group.

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the ERAS protocol shortened the length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use, and time of first stool in patients who underwent RC with ileal conduit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yafi F. A., Steinberg J. R., Kassouf W. Contemporary management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2008;13(6):504–509. doi: 10.1007/s10147-008-0788-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morii Y., Osawa T., Suzuki T., et al. Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs. BMC Urology . 2019;19(1):p. 110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0533-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kiss B., Burkhard F. C., Thalmann G. N. Open radical cystectomy: still the gold standard for muscle invasive bladder cancer. World Journal of Urology . 2016;34(1):33–39. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1729-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein J. P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2001;19(3):666–675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziouziou I., Irani J., Wei J. T., et al. Ileal conduit vs orthotopic neobladder: which one offers the best health-related quality of life in patients undergoing radical cystectomy? a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Progrès en Urologie . 2018;28(5):241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.02.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources