Use of Electronic Auscultation in Full Personal Protective Equipment to Detect Ventilation Status in Selective Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 35265648
- PMCID: PMC8899469
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.851395
Use of Electronic Auscultation in Full Personal Protective Equipment to Detect Ventilation Status in Selective Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Chest auscultation is the first procedure performed to detect endotracheal tube malpositioning but conventional stethoscopes do not conform to the personal protective equipment (PPE) protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic. This double-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of using ear-contactless electronic stethoscope to identify endobronchial blocker established selective lung ventilation, simulating endobronchial intubation during thoracic surgery with full PPE. Conventional and electronic auscultation was performed without and with full PPE, respectively, of 50 patients with selective lung ventilation. The rates of correct ventilation status detection were 86 and 88% in the conventional and electronic auscultation groups (p = 1.00). Electronic auscultation revealed a positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI 77 to 93%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 58 to 99%), comparable to the results for conventional auscultation. For detection of the true unilateral lung ventilation, the F1 score and the phi were 0.904 and 0.654, respectively for conventional auscultation; were 0.919 and 0.706, respectively for electronic auscultation. Furthermore, the user experience questionnaire revealed that the majority of participant anesthesiologists (90.5%) rated the audio quality of electronic lung sounds as comparable or superior to that of conventional acoustic lung sounds. In conclusion, electronic auscultation assessments of ventilation status as examined during thoracic surgery in full PPE were comparable in accuracy to corresponding conventional auscultation assessments made without PPE. Users reported satisfactory experience with the electronic stethoscope.
Keywords: COVID- 19; auscultation; electronic stethoscop; lung ventilation; personal protective equipment (PPE).
Copyright © 2022 Wei, Hsiung, Liu, Lin, Kuo and Wu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A Low-Cost, Ear-Contactless Electronic Stethoscope Powered by Raspberry Pi for Auscultation of Patients With COVID-19: Prototype Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e22753. doi: 10.2196/22753. JMIR Med Inform. 2021. PMID: 33436354 Free PMC article.
-
Brief report: pulmonary auscultation in the operating room: a prospective randomized blinded trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes.Anesth Analg. 2013 Sep;117(3):646-648. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829ec0a5. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Anesth Analg. 2013. PMID: 23868885 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiostethoscopes: an innovative solution for auscultation while wearing protective gear.Am J Disaster Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;6(5):285-8. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2011.0067. Am J Disaster Med. 2011. PMID: 22235600 Clinical Trial.
-
Review on the Advancements of Stethoscope Types in Chest Auscultation.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;13(9):1545. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091545. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174938 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Technology for enhancing chest auscultation in clinical simulation.Respir Care. 2011 Jun;56(6):834-45. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01072. Epub 2011 Feb 11. Respir Care. 2011. PMID: 21333091 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources