Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e08882.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08882. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Distinguishing between trait emotional intelligence and the five-factor model of personality: additive predictive validity of emotional intelligence for negative emotional states

Stjepan Sambol  1 , Emra Suleyman  1 , Jessica Scarfo  1 , Michelle Ball  1
Affiliations

Distinguishing between trait emotional intelligence and the five-factor model of personality: additive predictive validity of emotional intelligence for negative emotional states

Stjepan Sambol et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

There is ongoing debate on the utility of trait emotional intelligence and whether it is distinguishable from the five-factor model of personality. In study 1, we investigated the incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence in predicting negative emotional states, after controlling for the five-factor model personality traits. The TEIQue, Mini-IPIP, and DASS-21 were administered to a community based Australian sample. Three significant predictive models emerged: (1) wellbeing, and neuroticism predicting depression; (2) emotionality, and neuroticism predicting anxiety; and (3) self-control, and neuroticism predicting stress. In Study 2, we further explored the relationship between TEIQue domains, neuroticism, and negative emotional states. Three partial mediation models were found: (1) wellbeing mediated the relationship between neuroticism and depression; (2) emotionality mediated the relationship between neuroticism and anxiety; and (3) self-control mediated the relationship between neuroticism and stress. The findings highlight that trait emotional intelligence is related to, and yet distinct from extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness. They also provide support for the incremental validity of the TEIQue domains in predicting depression, anxiety, and stress, beyond the five-factor model personality traits in a community based Australian sample, with the domains of trait emotional intelligence potentially operating as protective factors from pervasive negative moods.

Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Emotional intelligence; Personality; Stress; TEIQue; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mediation model depicting the relationship between neuroticism, wellbeing, and depression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mediation model depicting the relationship between neuroticism, emotionality, and anxiety.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mediation model depicting the relationship between neuroticism, self-control, and stress.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alegre A., Pérez-Escoda N., López-Cassá E. The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and personality Is trait EI really anchored within the big five, big two and big one frameworks? Front. Psychol. 2019;10 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrei F., Siegling A.B., Aloe A.M., Baldaro B., Petrides K.V. The incremental validity of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pers. Assess. 2016;98(3):261–276. - PubMed
    1. Arteche A., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A., Crump J. The relationship of trait EI with personality, IQ and sex in a UK sample of employees. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 2008;16(4):421–426.
    1. Ashkanasy N.M., Daus C.S. Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. J. Organ. Behav. 2005;26(4):441–452.
    1. Baldasaro R., Shanahan M., Bauer D. Psychometric properties of the mini-IPIP in a large, nationally representative sample of young adults. J. Pers. Assess. 2013;95(1):74–84. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources