Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 29;2(6):331-335.
doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.10.004. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Point-of-care testing, your cardiologist, and affairs of the heart

Denise Dunlap  1   2 , Eric Ding  3 , Kristin Abramo  4 , Ziyue Wang  3 , Craig M Lilly  3   5   6 , Nathaniel Hafer  2   7   8 , Bryan Buchholz  2   9 , David D McManus  3   10
Affiliations
Review

Point-of-care testing, your cardiologist, and affairs of the heart

Denise Dunlap et al. Cardiovasc Digit Health J. .

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) has applications across medical specialties and holds promise to improve patient care. While cardiovascular medicine has been attractive for POCT applications in recent years, little is known about how cardiovascular health professionals perceive them.

Objective: The objective of our study was to examine differences in perceptions and attitudes towards POCTs between cardiovascular health professionals compared to other healthcare professionals.

Methods: We surveyed healthcare professionals to assess perceptions of POCT usage and their benefits and concerns between October 2019 and March 2020. Questions regarding POCT perceptions were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: We received a total of 148 survey responses; of the responders, 52% were male, 59% were physicians, and 50% worked in a hospital setting. We found that cardiology professionals were less likely, compared to other specialties, to view POCTs as improving patient management or reducing errors. These cardiology professionals were not constrained by resources or a lack of investment opportunities to implement these technologies.

Conclusion: This study provides a better understanding of perceptions about POCTs among healthcare specialists. To improve patient outcomes through the adoption and usage of POCTs, greater collaboration is advised among key industry and healthcare stakeholders.

Keywords: Cardiovascular medicine; Healthcare professional; Medical devices; Point-of-care; Technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Healthcare professional responses and classified conditions for which point-of-care tests can help with the (1) diagnosis of a disease and (2) management and monitoring of a disease. Note: Condition responses were classified into standard medical specialties and sorted by the number of responses in each category. “Other” category includes any conditions outside of the categorization scheme and any categories for which there were fewer than 5 responses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Al-Alusi M., Ding E., McManus D., Lubitz S. Wearing your heart on your sleeve: the future of cardiac rhythm monitoring. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster K.R., Torous J. The opportunity and obstacles for smartwatches and wearable sensors. IEEE Pulse. 2019;10:22–25. - PubMed
    1. Isakadze N., Martin S. How useful is the smartwatch ECG? Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30:442–448. - PubMed
    1. Dinmohamed A., Visser O., Verhoeven R., et al. Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:750–751. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaufman H., Chen Z., Niles J., Fesko Y. Changes in the number of US patients with newly identified cancer before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3 e2017267–e2017267. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources