Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Single-Centre Retrospective Study Comparing Microspheres Versus n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate
- PMID: 35266024
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03069-3
Prostatic Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Single-Centre Retrospective Study Comparing Microspheres Versus n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue (NBCA) versus microspheres for prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
Materials and methods: This institutional review board-approved, single-centre, retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing PAE from September 2017 to July 2020. Age, medical history, previous treatment, pre- and post-PAE prostatic volumes and International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs) were systematically analysed. Procedural duration, dosimetry, immediate and delayed complications were recorded. Patients at the beginning of the study were treated with microspheres and patients at the end of the study with NBCA. The main outcome measures were the absolute and relative changes in IPSS at 3 months. Statistical analyses comprised unpaired t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, Chi-2 tests, uni- and multivariate linear regressions.
Results: Sixty-two patients were included (median age: 65.9 years). Thirty-two patients were treated with microspheres and 30 with NBCA. There were no significant baseline differences between the two groups except for the baseline PSA (P = 0.0251). Average procedural and fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure were significantly lower in the NBCA group versus the microspheres group (80.7 ± 22.5 versus 112 ± 42.1 min [P = 0.0011], 24.2 ± 9.6 min versus 42.1 ± 20.2 min [P = 0.0001], 12,004.6 ± 6702 uGy.m2 versus 25,614.9 ± 15,749.2 uGy.m2 [P = 0.0001], respectively). Immediate complications were all minor, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (4/32 [12.5%] with microspheres versus 7/30 [23.3%] with NBCA, P = 0.4335), nor for delayed complications (P = 1). No association was found between the PAE techniques and the absolute change in IPSS at 3 months (-10.2 ± 7.9 with microspheres versus -9.5 ± 7.6 with NBCA, P = 0.7157).
Conclusion: PAE using NBCA was safe and effective for symptomatic BPO, with faster procedures, lower radiation exposure and similar safety and efficacy compared to microspheres. Operator learning curve could have biased the procedural times and radiation exposure between groups favouring NBCA.
Keywords: Benign prostatic obstruction; Cyanoacrylate embolic glues; Embolization; Microspheres; Prostate.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
Comment in
-
Prostate Artery Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Rationale for the Use of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue as an Embolic Agent.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun;45(6):824-825. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03144-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35441241 No abstract available.
-
Prostatic Artery Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue in Patients with Indwelling Catheter.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):295-298. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03315-8. Epub 2022 Nov 10. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36357699 No abstract available.
References
-
- Carnevale FC, Antunes AA, da MottaLealFilho JM, de OliveiraCerri LM, Baroni RH, Marcelino AS, Freire GC, Moreira AM, Srougi M, Cerri GG. Prostatic artery embolization as a primary treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: preliminary results in two patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(2):355–61. - DOI
-
- Parsons JK, Dahm P, Köhler TS, Lerner LB, Wilt TJ. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline amendment 2020. J Urol. 2020;204:799–804. - DOI
-
- Uflacker A, Haskal ZJ, Bilhim T, Patrie J, Huber T, Pisco JM. Meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:1686-1697.e8. - DOI
-
- Knight GM, Talwar A, Salem R, Mouli S. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prostatic artery embolization to gold-standard transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44:183–93. - DOI
-
- Carnevale FC, Antunes AA. Prostatic artery embolization for enlarged prostates due to benign prostatic hyperplasia how I do it. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(6):1452–63. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous