Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;76(9):1445-1453.
doi: 10.1037/amp0000937.

Visual metacognition: Measures, models, and neural correlates

Affiliations
Review

Visual metacognition: Measures, models, and neural correlates

Dobromir Rahnev. Am Psychol. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Visual metacognition is the ability to evaluate one's performance on visual perceptual tasks. The field of visual metacognition unites the long tradition of visual psychophysics with the younger field of metacognition research. This article traces the historical roots of the field and reviews progress in the areas of (a) constructing appropriate measures of metacognitive ability, (b) developing computational models, and (c) revealing the neural correlates of visual metacognition. First, I review the most popular measures of metacognitive ability with an emphasis on their psychophysical properties. Second, I examine the empirical targets for modeling, the dominant modeling frameworks and the assumed computations underlying visual metacognition. Third, I explore the progress on understanding the neural correlates of visual metacognition by focusing on anatomical and functional studies, as well as causal manipulations. What emerges is a picture of substantial progress on constructing measures, developing models, and revealing the neural correlates of metacognition, but very little integration between these three areas of inquiry. I then explore the deep, intrinsic links between the three areas of research and argue that continued progress requires the recognition and exploitation of these links. Throughout, I discuss the implications of progress in visual metacognition for other areas of metacognition research, and pinpoint specific advancements that could be adopted by researchers working in other subfields of metacognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

None

References

    1. Aitchison L, Bang D, Bahrami B, & Latham PE (2015). Doubly Bayesian Analysis of Confidence in Perceptual Decision-Making. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004519. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004519 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen M, Glen JC, Müllensiefen D, Schwarzkopf DS, Fardo F, Frank D, Callaghan MF, & Rees G (2017). Metacognitive ability correlates with hippocampal and prefrontal microstructure. NeuroImage, 149, 415–423. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baird B, Smallwood J, Gorgolewski KJ, & Margulies DS (2013). Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(42), 16657–16665. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-13.2013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang D, & Fleming SM (2018). Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(23), 6082–6087. 10.1073/pnas.1800795115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang JW, Shekhar M, & Rahnev D (2019). Sensory noise increases metacognitive efficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(3), 437–452. 10.1037/xge0000511 - DOI - PubMed