Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 27;11(5):704.
doi: 10.3390/foods11050704.

Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Sausages Made with Grasshopper (Sphenarium purpurascens) Flour

Affiliations

Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Sausages Made with Grasshopper (Sphenarium purpurascens) Flour

Salvador O Cruz-López et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Insects are currently of interest due to their high nutritional value, in particular for the high concentration of quality protein. Moreover, it can also be used as an extender or binder in meat products. The objective was to evaluate grasshopper flour (GF) as a partial or total replacement for potato starch to increase the protein content of sausages and achieve good acceptability by consumers. GF has 48% moisture, 6.7% fat and 45% total protein. Sausages were analyzed by NIR and formulations with GF in all concentrations (10, 7, 5 and 3%) combined with starch (3, 5 and 7%) increased protein content. Results obtained for the sausages formulations with grasshoppers showed an increase in hardness, springiness, gumminess and chewiness through a Texture-Profile-Analysis. Moreover, a* and b* are similar to the control, but L* decreased. The check-all-that-apply test showed the attributes highlighted for sausages with GF possessed herbal flavor, brown color, and granular texture. The liking-product-landscape map showed that the incorporation of 7 and 10% of GF had an overall liking of 3.2 and 3.3, respectively, considered as "do not like much". GF can be used as a binder in meat products up to 10% substitution. However, it is important to improve the overall liking of the sausage.

Keywords: edible insects; grasshopper; non-meat ingredients; protein; sausages; starch chewy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correspondence factorial analysis of the sausage descriptors. (a) smell-appearance, F1 and F2 axes explain 98.94% of the data; (b) taste-texture. The F1 and F2 axes explain 91.2% of all the data. Control: sausages formulated with 10% starch without GF; F1 sausages formulated with 10% GF without starch; F2 sausages formulated with 3% starch and 7% GF.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Liking Product Landscape. Consumers’ map created with multidimensional scaling (MDS) fed with overall liking and product acceptance maps created with support vector machines (SVM). Each map presents the average of liking in addition to the mean absolute error (MAE) of the product acceptance maps on a scale of 1 to 7. Control sausages formulated with 10% starch without GF; F1 sausages formulated with 10% GF without starch; F2 sausages formulated with 3% starch and 7% GF.

References

    1. Van Huis A., Van Itterbeeck J., Klunder H., Mertens E., Halloran A., Muir G., Vantomme P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security (No. 171) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Rome, Italy: 2013. [(accessed on 1 December 2021)]. pp. 1–5. Available online: https://edepot.wur.nl/258042.
    1. Sosa D.A.T., Fogliano V. Potencial of insect-derived ingredients for food applications. In: Schields V.D.C., editor. Insect Physiology and Ecology. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2017. pp. 215–231. - DOI
    1. Da Silva Lucas A.J., De Oliveira L.M., Da Rocha M., Prentice C. Edible insects: An alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds. Food Chem. 2020;311:126022. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gahukar R.T. Edible insects collected from forests for family livelihood and wellness of rural communities: A review. Glob. Food Sec. 2020;25:100348. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100348. - DOI
    1. Mariutti L.R.B., Rebelo K.S., Bisconsin-Junior A., De Morais J.S., Magnani M., Maldonade I.R., Cazarin C.B.B. The use of alternative food sources to improve health and guarantee access and food intake. Food Res. Int. 2021;149:110709. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110709. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources