Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28;14(5):1262.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14051262.

The Effect of Hypoxia on Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio for Cells Irradiated with Grenz Rays

Affiliations

The Effect of Hypoxia on Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio for Cells Irradiated with Grenz Rays

Chun-Chieh Chan et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Grenz-ray therapy (GT) is commonly used for dermatological radiotherapy and has a higher linear energy transfer, relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). GT is a treatment option for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma. This study aims to calculate the RBE for DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction and cell survival under hypoxic conditions for GT. The yield of DSBs induced by GT is calculated at the aerobic and hypoxic conditions, using a Monte Carlo damage simulation (MCDS) software. The RBE value for cell survival is calculated using the repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model. The RBE values for cell survival for cells irradiated by 15 kV, 10 kV and 10 kVp and titanium K-shell X-rays (4.55 kV) relative to 60Co γ-rays are 1.0-1.6 at the aerobic conditions and moderate hypoxia (2% O2), respectively, but increase to 1.2, 1.4 and 1.9 and 2.1 in conditions of severe hypoxia (0.1% O2). The OER values for DSB induction relative to 60Co γ-rays are about constant and ~2.4 for GT, but the OER for cell survival is 2.8-2.0 as photon energy decreases from 15 kV to 4.55 kV. The results indicate that GT results in more DSB induction and allows effective tumor control for superficial and hypoxic tumors.

Keywords: Grenz rays; cell survival; double strand break; hypoxia; oxygen enhancement ratio; relative biological effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of double-strand break (DSB) induction as a function of oxygen concentration: the symbol Ti denotes titanium K-shell.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) for double-strand break (DSB) induction for cells irradiated by photons. The lines are the Monte Carlo damage simulation (MCDS) results and those for other Monte Carlo simulations [69]. The individual symbols represent the experimental OER values for V79 cells [17,61], Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells [38] and human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells [70]. (B) OER for cell survival at 10% as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and mean photon energy. These measured OER values are from published studies: CHO cells [38,39,71], Hela cells [72] and V79 cells irradiated with photons [17,18,40,73,74] and protons [18].
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) for double-strand break (DSB) induction for cells irradiated by photons. The lines are the Monte Carlo damage simulation (MCDS) results and those for other Monte Carlo simulations [69]. The individual symbols represent the experimental OER values for V79 cells [17,61], Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells [38] and human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells [70]. (B) OER for cell survival at 10% as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and mean photon energy. These measured OER values are from published studies: CHO cells [38,39,71], Hela cells [72] and V79 cells irradiated with photons [17,18,40,73,74] and protons [18].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for cells irradiated by ultrasoft X-rays as a function of linear energy transfer (LET). (A) The repair–misrepair–fixation (RMF)-model-predicted RBE values for cell survival at 10% are plotted for oxygen concentrations of 21% (solid line), 2% (dash-dotted line) and 0.1% (dotted line). The experimental RBE values were measured at an oxygen concentration of 21% O2 for V79 cells [17,75,76], Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells [75] and human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-12A [77] after photon irradiations. (B)The values for parameter α using RMF model: the equations for the α value under aerobic and hypoxic conditions are, respectively, α = 0.0466 × LET + 0.2412 (R2 = 0.9443) (21% O2) and α = 0.0402 × LET + 0.0466 (R2 = 0.9161) (0.1% O2). These measured α values are from published studies: CHO cells and V79 cells irradiated with photons at an aerobic condition (21% O2) [61,71,75] and at a hypoxic condition (0.1% O2) [61,71].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for cells irradiated by ultrasoft X-rays as a function of linear energy transfer (LET). (A) The repair–misrepair–fixation (RMF)-model-predicted RBE values for cell survival at 10% are plotted for oxygen concentrations of 21% (solid line), 2% (dash-dotted line) and 0.1% (dotted line). The experimental RBE values were measured at an oxygen concentration of 21% O2 for V79 cells [17,75,76], Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells [75] and human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-12A [77] after photon irradiations. (B)The values for parameter α using RMF model: the equations for the α value under aerobic and hypoxic conditions are, respectively, α = 0.0466 × LET + 0.2412 (R2 = 0.9443) (21% O2) and α = 0.0402 × LET + 0.0466 (R2 = 0.9161) (0.1% O2). These measured α values are from published studies: CHO cells and V79 cells irradiated with photons at an aerobic condition (21% O2) [61,71,75] and at a hypoxic condition (0.1% O2) [61,71].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Panizzon R.G. Grenz rays: An alternative treatment for superficial skin cancers in elderly patients. Aging Health. 2009;5:495–496. doi: 10.2217/ahe.09.46. - DOI
    1. Panizzon R.G., Seegenschmiedt M.H. Radiation Treatment and Radiation Reactions in Dermatology. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2015.
    1. Hanlon A. A Practical Guide to Skin Cancer. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2018.
    1. Drakensjö I.R.T., Rosen E., Frohm Nilsson M., Girnita A. Ten-year follow-up study of grenz ray treatment for lentigo maligna and early lentigo maligna melanoma. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020;100:adv00282. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3631. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendrickx A., Cozzio A., Plasswilm L., Panje C.M. Radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma—A systematic review. Radiat. Oncol. 2020;15:174. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01615-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources