Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 7;11(5):1456.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11051456.

HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques

Affiliations
Review

HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques

Felix Gronau et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery including gastrectomy and complete removal of all peritoneal lesions followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves promising results. There exists an immersive variety of approaches for HIPEC that makes it difficult to weigh different results obtained in the literature. In order to enable standardization and development of HIPEC, we here present a systematic review of different drug regimens and technical approaches. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on 26 May 2021 using the mesh terms "intraperitoneal chemotherapy AND gastric cancer". Under consideration of systematic review guidelines, articles reporting on HIPEC in combination with CRS were selected. Data on duration, drugs, dosage, and other application parameters as well as morbidity and long term survival data were extracted for subsequent statistical analysis, tabulation, and descriptive synthesis. We assessed the risk of bias due to inhomogeneity of the patient cohort and incompleteness of report of HIPEC parameters. (3) Results: Out of 1421 screened publications, 42 publications presenting data from 1325 patients met the criteria. Most of the publications were single institutional retrospective cohort studies. The most common HIPEC regimen is performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis and consists of 50-200 mg/m2 cisplatinum and 30-40 mg/m2 mytomycin C at 42-43 °C for 60-90 min in a closed abdomen HIPEC system with three tubes. Almost every study reported incompletely on HIPEC parameters. Lower rates of anastomotic leakage were reported in studies that performed HIPEC after gastrointestinal anastomosis. Studies that performed open HIPEC and integrated a two-drug regimen indicated better overall survival rates. (4) Discussion: This is an exhaustive overview of the use of drug regimens and techniques for HIPEC after CRS for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Other indications and application modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy such as prophylactic or palliative HIPEC apart from CRS were not addressed. (5) Conclusion: Complete report of HIPEC parameters should be included in every publication. A consensus for dose expression either per BSA or as flat dose is desirable for comparison of the drug regimens. Despite numerous variations, we identified the most common regimens and techniques and their advantages and disadvantages according to the data in the literature. More phase I/II studies are needed to identify the best approach for HIPEC. (6) Other: This review was not supported by third parties.

Keywords: PRISMA; cytoreductive surgery; gastric cancer; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); intraperitoneal chemotherapy; peritoneal metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodology for article screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Duration for HIPEC.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of drugs used for HIPEC.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Second drug for HIPEC.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kind of drug.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomassen I., van Gestel Y.R., van Ramshorst B., Luyer M.D., Bosscha K., Nienhuijs S.W., Lemmens V.E., de Hingh I.H. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: A population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;134:622–628. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28373. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoo C.H., Noh S.H., Shin D.W., Choi S.H., Min J.S. Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2000;87:236–242. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01360.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rau B., Brandl A., Thuss-Patience P., Bergner F., Raue W., Arnold A., Horst D., Pratschke J., Biebl M. The efficacy of treatment options for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1226–1237. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00969-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solon J.G., O’Neill M., Chang K.H., Deady S., Cahill R., Moran B., Shields C., Mulsow J. An 18 year population-based study on site of origin and outcome of patients with peritoneal malignancy in Ireland. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 2017;43:1924–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources