Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
- PMID: 35270248
- PMCID: PMC8909841
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052557
Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
Abstract
Introduction: Sudden cardiac arrest is one of the most common causes of death. In cases of shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation, immediate transport of patients to the hospital is essential and made possible with use of devices for mechanical chest compression.
Objectives: The efficacy of AutoPulse in patients with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation was studied.
Methods: This is a multicentre observational study on a population of 480,000, with 192 reported cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The study included patients with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation defined as cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular fibrillation requiring ≥3 consecutive shocks. Eventually, 18 patients met the study criteria.
Results: The mean duration of resuscitation was 48.4±43 min, 55% of patients were handed over to the laboratory while still in cardiac arrest, 83.3% of them underwent angiography and, in 93.3% of them, infarction was confirmed. Coronary intervention was continued during mechanical resuscitation in 50.0% of patients, 60% of patients survived the procedure, and 27.8% of the patients survived.
Conclusions: Resistant ventricular fibrillation suggests high likelihood of a coronary component to the cardiac arrest. AutoPulse is helpful in conducting resuscitation, allowing the time to arrival at hospital to be reduced.
Keywords: PCI; cardiac arrest; catheterization laboratory; mechanical chest compression; ventricular fibrillation.
Conflict of interest statement
The ambulances and the catheterization laboratories have been equipped with the AP systems from local government funds. The study has not been funded by any corporation or financed from any grant. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Soar J., Nolan J.P., Böttiger B.W., Perkins G.D., Lott C., Carli P., Pellis T., Sandroni C., Skrifvars M.B., Smith G.B., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015;95:100–147. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wagner H., Terkelsen C.J., Friberg H., Harnek J., Kern K., Lassen J.F., Olivecrona G.K. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation. 2010;81:383–387. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Piccini J.P., White J.A., Mehta R.H., Lokhnygina Y., Al-Khatib S.M., Tricoci P., Pollack J.C.V., Montalescot G., Van de Werf F., Gibson C.M., et al. Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation Complicating Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2012;126:41–49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071860. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous