Psychological Interventions for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence in Humanitarian Settings: An Overview of the Evidence and Implementation Considerations
- PMID: 35270610
- PMCID: PMC8910593
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052916
Psychological Interventions for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence in Humanitarian Settings: An Overview of the Evidence and Implementation Considerations
Abstract
This paper provides an analytical overview of different types of psychological interventions that have demonstrated efficacy in low-income and/or humanitarian settings and points to special considerations that may be needed if used with women who have been subjected to gender-based violence (GBV). This paper reviews diverse therapeutic modalities and contrasts them across several domains, including their conventional use and principles; their documented use and efficacy in humanitarian settings; any special considerations or modifications necessary for GBV-affected clients; and any additional resources or implementation concerns when working in low-income contexts. By examining the evidence base of multiple interventions, we hope to provide clinicians and GBV-prevention advocates with an overview of tools/approaches to provide survivor-centered, trauma-informed responses to GBV survivors. This analysis responds to the growing recognition that gender-based violence, in particular intimate partner violence and sexual violence, is strongly associated with mental health problems, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. This is likely to be exacerbated in humanitarian contexts, where people often experience multiple and intersecting traumatic experiences. The need for mental health services in these settings is increasingly recognized, and a growing number of psychological interventions have been shown to be effective when delivered by lay providers and in humanitarian settings.
Keywords: gender-based violence; humanitarian; intimate partner violence; mental health; psychological interventions; sexual violence.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.
References
-
- Devries K.M., Mak J.Y., Bacchus L.J., Child J., Falder G., Petzold M., Astbury J., Watts C.H. Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Silove D., Baker J.R., Mohsin M., Teesson M., Creamer M., O’Donnell M., Forbes D., Carragher N., Slade T., Mills K., et al. The contribution of gender-based violence and network trauma to gender differences in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171879. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rees S., Silove D., Chey T., Ivancic L., Steel Z., Creamer M., Teesson M.R., Bryant R., McFarlane A.C., Mills K.L., et al. Lifetime Prevalence of Gender-Based Violence in Women and the Relationship With Mental Disorders and Psychosocial Function. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011;306:513–521. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1098. - DOI - PubMed
-
- WHO . Violence against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018: Global, Regional and National Prevalence Estimates for Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Global and Regional Prevalence Estimates for Non-Partner Sexual Violence against Women. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical