Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):e312-e316.
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Efficacy of an Esophageal Spacer for Spine Radiosurgery: First Experience

Affiliations

Efficacy of an Esophageal Spacer for Spine Radiosurgery: First Experience

Thomas Boerner et al. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

This is the first study to investigate the use of an esophageal hydrogel spacer in spine stereotactic radiosurgery. The tolerability and the dose reduction to the esophagus are predicted to reduce the incidence of high-grade toxicities, which in turn can permit dose escalation to optimize tumor control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative axial and sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging views acquired at diagnosis (A) and after spacer insertion (B,C) showing displacement of the esophagus away from the paraspinal tumor. Abbreviations: OAR = organs at risk.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The spacer was placed via video-assisted thoracic surgery (A). Intrathoracic view after dissection of the esophagus from the spine and chordoma (B). The hydrogel was injected around the esophagus and polymerized to form a solid gel between the tumor and esophagus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative axial (A), coronal (B), and sagittal (C) sections from the postspacer computed tomography simulation scan and treatment plan demonstrate comprehensive coverage of the target volume and steep dose falloff. Dose-volume histograms illustrate esophageal dose sparing after versus before spacer placement (D). The spacer reduced the volume of the esophagus that initially overlapped with the high-dose region. All target volume constraints were achieved. Abbreviations: PTV = planning target volume.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging views acquired after spacer placement (A) and 2 years after radiation therapy with completely absorbed spacer (B).

References

    1. Glicksman RM, Tjong MC, Neves-Junior WFP, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the management of spinal metastases: A review. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:567–577. - PubMed
    1. Cox BW, Jackson A, Hunt M, Bilsky M, Yamada Y. Esophageal toxicity from high-dose, single-fraction paraspinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:e661–667. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ogita M, Yamashita H, Nozawa Y, et al. Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: Acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mariados N, Sylvester J, Shah D, et al. Hydrogel spacer prospective multicenter randomized controlled pivotal trial: Dosimetric and clinical effects of perirectal spacer application in men undergoing prostate image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:971–977. - PubMed
    1. Pinkawa M, Piroth MD, Holy R, et al. Spacer stability and prostate position variability during radiotherapy for prostate cancer applying a hydrogel to protect the rectal wall. Radiother Oncol. 2013;106:220–224. - PubMed