Impact of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Driving Disability: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial With 10-Year Follow-Up
- PMID: 35273107
- PMCID: PMC9519085
- DOI: 10.14444/8199
Impact of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Driving Disability: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial With 10-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
Background: Driving an automobile requires the ability to turn the neck laterally. Anecdotally, patients with multilevel fusions often complain about restricted turning motion. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on driving disability improvement at 10-year follow-up after a 2-level procedure.
Methods: In the original randomized controlled trial, patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy at 2 levels underwent CDA or ACDF. The driving disability question from the Neck Disability Index was rated from 0 to 5 years preoperatively and up to 10 years postoperatively. Severity of driving disability was categorized into "none" (score 0), "mild" (1 or 2), and "severe" (3, 4, or 5). Score and severity were compared between groups.
Results: Out of 397 patients, 148 CDA and 118 ACDF patients had 10-year follow-up. Driving disability scores were not different between the groups preoperatively (CDA: 2.65; ACDF: 2.71, P = 0.699). Postoperatively, the scores in the CDA group were significantly lower than those in the ACDF group at 5 (0.60 vs 1.08, P ≤ 0.001) and 10 years (0.66 vs 1.07, P = 0.001). Mean score improvement in the CDA group was significantly greater than the ACDF group at 10-year follow-up (-1.94 vs -1.63, P = 0.003). The majority of patients reported severe driving disability (CDA: 56.9%, ACDF: 58.0%, P = 0.968) before surgery. After surgery, a greater proportion of patients in the CDA group had neck pain-free driving compared with the ACDF group at 5 (63.3% vs 41.8%, P < 0.001) and 10 years (61.8% vs 41.2%, P = 0.003).
Conclusion: In patients with cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy and 2-level disease, CDA provided greater improvements in driving disability as compared with ACDF at 10-year follow-up. This is the first report of its kind. This finding may be attributable to preservation of motion associated with CDA.
Clinical relevence: This study provides valuable information regarding the improvement of driving disability after both CDA and ACDF. It demonstrates that both procedures result in significant improvements, with CDA resulting in even better improvements than ACDF, up to 10 year follow-up.
Keywords: anterior cervical discectomy; cervical disc arthroplasty; driving disability; fusion.
This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2022 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: K. Daniel Riew reports royalties or licenses from Biomet; consulting fees from NuVasive and Happe Spine; a leadership role with NASS; and stock or stock options from Axiomed, Expanding Orthopedics, Spineology, Spinal Kinetics, Amedica, Vertiflex, Benvenue, and Paradigm Spine. Todd Lanman reports royalties from Stryker, NuVasive, and Choice Spine. Deeptee Jain reports consulting fees from Kaia Health and Medtronic. Matthew Gornet reports royalties or licenses from Medtronic, RTI, and Pioneer Surgical; consulting fees from Aesculap; and stock or stock options from Bonovo, International Spine & Orthopedic Institute, LLLC, Nocimed, OuroBoros, and RTI. Michael Kelly reports grants or contracts from OMeGA, the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, the International Spine Study Group Foundation, and the Scoliosis Research Society; and a leadership role with the Scoliosis Research Society and Spine. The remaining authors have no disclosures.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28291414
-
Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial.J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;31(4):508-518. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19157. Print 2019 Oct 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019. PMID: 31226684
-
Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-Long-Term Evidence Update.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40. doi: 10.14444/7089. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32994304 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27314663 Review.
-
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3203. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113203. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892914 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Driving after spine surgery: biomechanics, recovery pathways, and medico-legal insights.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 15;20(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05787-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40229857 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Increased rates of dysphagia, longer length of stay, nonroutine discharge, and higher hospital costs in patients over 65 undergoing single-level cervical disc arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched analysis.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):54-60. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_21_25. Epub 2025 Apr 1. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025. PMID: 40292160 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, et al. . Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):532–545. 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources