Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 22:13:827866.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.827866. eCollection 2022.

Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review

Zafer Keser et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Despite the high prevalence of stroke, characterizing the acute neural recovery patterns that follow stroke and predicting long-term recovery remains challenging. Objective methods to quantify and characterize neural injury are still lacking. Since neuroimaging methods have a poor temporal resolution, EEG has been used as a method for characterizing post-stroke recovery mechanisms for various deficits including motor, language, and cognition as well as predicting treatment response to experimental therapies. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has been used in conjunction with EEG (TMS-EEG) to evaluate neurophysiology for a variety of indications. TMS-EEG has significant potential for exploring brain connectivity using focal TMS-evoked potentials and oscillations, which may allow for the system-specific delineation of recovery patterns after stroke. In this review, we summarize the use of EEG alone or in combination with TMS in post-stroke motor, language, cognition, and functional/global recovery. Overall, stroke leads to a reduction in higher frequency activity (≥8 Hz) and intra-hemispheric connectivity in the lesioned hemisphere, which creates an activity imbalance between non-lesioned and lesioned hemispheres. Compensatory activity in the non-lesioned hemisphere leads mostly to unfavorable outcomes and further aggravated interhemispheric imbalance. Balanced interhemispheric activity with increased intrahemispheric coherence in the lesioned networks correlates with improved post-stroke recovery. TMS-EEG studies reveal the clinical importance of cortical reactivity and functional connectivity within the sensorimotor cortex for motor recovery after stroke. Although post-stroke motor studies support the prognostic value of TMS-EEG, more studies are needed to determine its utility as a biomarker for recovery across domains including language, cognition, and hemispatial neglect. As a complement to MRI-based technologies, EEG-based technologies are accessible and valuable non-invasive clinical tools in stroke neurology.

Keywords: EEG; TMS-EEG; functional connectivity; recovery; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BL has no personal financial interests; other conflicts include named inventor (Cadence Neuroscience Inc., waived rights), investigator (Medtronic EPAS, NeuroPace RESPONSE, Neuroelectrics tDCS for Epilepsy), and consultant (Epiminder, Medtronic, Philips Neuro). GW has licensed intellectual property to Cadence Neuroscience and NeuroOne Inc., and is an investigator on projects with Medtronic, NeuroOne Inc., Cadence Neuroscience, and UNEEG Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. . Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2021) 143:e254–743. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim J, Thayabaranathan T, Donnan GA, Howard G, Howard VJ, Rothwell PM, et al. . Global stroke statistics 2019. Int J Stroke. (2020) 15:819–38. 10.1177/1747493020909545 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown AW, Therneau TM, Schultz BA, Niewczyk PM, Granger CV. Measure of functional independence dominates discharge outcome prediction after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Stroke. (2015) 46:1038–44. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007392 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Celnik P, Birmbaumer N. “How much will I recover, doctor?” Some help with an ever-elusive answer. Neurology. (2014) 82:192–3. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. (2020) 2:17. 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed