Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 2;13(1):137-147.
doi: 10.1007/s13167-022-00271-8. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Predicting acupuncture efficacy for functional dyspepsia based on routine clinical features: a machine learning study in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

Affiliations

Predicting acupuncture efficacy for functional dyspepsia based on routine clinical features: a machine learning study in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

Tao Yin et al. EPMA J. .

Abstract

Background: Acupuncture is safe and effective for functional dyspepsia (FD), while its efficacy varies among individuals. Predicting the response of different FD patients to acupuncture treatment in advance and therefore administering the tailored treatment to the individual is consistent with the principle of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM). In the current study, the individual efficacy prediction models were developed based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and routine clinical features, aiming to predict the efficacy of acupuncture in treating FD and identify the FD patients who were appropriate to acupuncture treatment.

Methods: A total of 745 FD patients were collected from two clinical trials. All the patients received a 4-week acupuncture treatment. Based on the demographic and baseline clinical features of 80% of patients in trial 1, the SVM models were established to predict the acupuncture response and improvements of symptoms and quality of life (QoL) at the end of treatment. Then, the left 20% of patients in trial 1 and 193 patients in trial 2 were respectively applied to evaluate the internal and external generalizations of these models.

Results: These models could predict the efficacy of acupuncture successfully. In the internal test set, models achieved an accuracy of 0.773 in predicting acupuncture response and an R 2 of 0.446 and 0.413 in the prediction of QoL and symptoms improvements, respectively. Additionally, these models had well generalization in the independent validation set and could also predict, to a certain extent, the long-term efficacy of acupuncture at the 12-week follow-up. The gender, subtype of disease, and education level were finally identified as the critical predicting features.

Conclusion: Based on the SVM algorithm and routine clinical features, this study established the models to predict acupuncture efficacy for FD patients. The prediction models developed accordingly are promising to assist doctors in judging patients' responses to acupuncture in advance, so that they could tailor and adjust acupuncture treatment plans for different patients in a prospective rather than the reactive manner, which could greatly improve the clinical efficacy of acupuncture treatment for FD and save medical expenditures.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-022-00271-8.

Keywords: Acupuncture; Artificial intelligence; Efficacy prediction; Functional dyspepsia; Healthcare; Machine learning; Precision medicine; Predictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM); Support vector machine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The number of participants who survived in each stage
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The performance of prediction models in the internal test set. (A-1) illustrates the overall performance of the SVC model in predicting acupuncture response at the end of treatment. (A-2) illustrates the receiver operating characteristic curve corresponding to the AUC. (B-1) and (C-1) show the scatter plots between the actual and the predicted improvements of NDLQI and NDSI of the internal test samples, respectively. (B-2) and (C-2) illustrate the predicted labels and their corresponding actual labels of these test samples. (A/B/C-3, A/B/C-4) displays the results of permutation tests for these predication analyses. Abbreviation: Acc, accuracy; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; NDSI, Nepean Dyspepsia Symptom Index; NDLQI, Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index; R2, coefficient of determination; MSE, mean squared error
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The weight of each feature in predicting acupuncture efficacy. (A) illustrates the weight of each feature in predicting acupuncture response; (B) and (C) show the weight of each feature in predicting NDSI and NDLQI improvements. The ranking order of the features is consistent with Table 1. The red dotted lines represent the mean + standard deviation of features’ weights
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Performance comparison among linear SVM and other ML algorithms in prediction acupuncture efficacy. (A), (B), and (C) illustrate the results of performance comparison in predicting acupuncture response, NDLQI improvements, and NDSI improvements among these six algorithms in the internal validation set (the left panels) and independent validation set (the right panels). Abbreviation: Acc, accuracy; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity; NDSI, Nepean Dyspepsia Symptom Index; NDLQI, Nepean Dyspepsia Life Quality Index; R2, coefficient of determination; MSE, mean squared error; SVC, support vector classification; DT, decision tree; LR, logistic regression; rbf SVM, radial basis function support vector classification; BT, boosted tree; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; SVR, support vector regression; MLR, multiple linear regression; GPR, Gaussian process regression

References

    1. Stanghellini V, Chan FK, Hasler WL, Malagelada JR, Suzuki H, Tack J, et al. Gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1380–1392. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barberio B, Mahadeva S, Black CJ, Savarino EV, Ford AC. Systematic review with meta-analysis: global prevalence of uninvestigated dyspepsia according to the Rome criteria. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52(5):762–773. doi: 10.1111/apt.16006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford AC, Marwaha A, Lim A, Moayyedi P. What is the prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in subjects with dyspepsia? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(10):830–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford AC, Mahadeva S, Carbone MF, Lacy BE, Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia. Lancet. 2020;396(10263):1689–1702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30469-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brook RA, Kleinman NL, Choung RS, Melkonian AK, Smeeding JE, Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia impacts absenteeism and direct and indirect costs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(6):498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources