Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;39(7):e14828.
doi: 10.1111/dme.14828. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology to manage type 1 diabetes in very young children during a clinical trial: Qualitative study

Affiliations

Parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology to manage type 1 diabetes in very young children during a clinical trial: Qualitative study

Ruth I Hart et al. Diabet Med. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: To explore parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology when caring for a very young child with type 1 diabetes during a clinical trial.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with parents of 30 children (aged 1-7 years) participating in a trial (the KidsAP02 study) comparing hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery with sensor-augmented pump therapy. In both arms, parents had access to remote monitoring technology. Data analysis focused on identification of descriptive themes.

Results: Remote monitoring technology gave parents improved access to data which helped them pre-empt and manage glucose excursions. Parents observed how, when children were in their own care, they could be more absent while present, as their attention could shift to non-diabetes-related activities. Conversely, when children were others' care, remote monitoring enabled parents to be present while absent, by facilitating oversight and collaboration with caregivers. Parents described how remote monitoring made them feel more confident allowing others to care for their children. Parents' confidence increased when using a hybrid closed-loop system, as less work was required to keep glucose in range. Benefits to children were also highlighted, including being able to play and sleep uninterrupted and attend parties and sleepovers without their parents. While most parents welcomed the increased sense of control remote monitoring offered, some noted downsides, such as lack of respite from caregiving responsibilities.

Conclusions: Remote monitoring can offer manifold benefits to both parents and very young children with type 1 diabetes. Some parents, however, may profit from opportunities to take 'time out'.

Keywords: closed-loop system; parents; qualitative research; remote monitoring; sensor-augmented pump therapy; type 1 diabetes; young children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RH reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, serving on advisory panel for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk and receiving licence fees from BBraun and Medtronic. RH also reports patents, patent applications, shareholding and directorship at CamDiab. FC has attended Advisory Boards and obtained speaking fees for Abbott, Medtronic, Lilly and NovoNordisk. CdB has contributed to the Medtronic e‐learning tools. EFR reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, and serving on advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Sanofi. SH declares having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Pfizer. TMK has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and MerckSerono and consulted Sanofi for a transition brochure. BRM has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Diabetes Care, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi and Menarini, and has been on the advisory boards of Roche Diabetes Care and Abbott Diabetes Care. The authors RIH, BK, DR, CKB, JW, JMA, AT and JL have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Craig M, Hattersley A, Donaghue KC. Definition, epidemiology and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009;10:3‐12. - PubMed
    1. Sundberg F, Barnard K, Cato A, et al. Managing diabetes in preschool children. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18:499‐517. - PubMed
    1. Lawton J, Waugh N, Barnard KD, et al. Challenges of optimizing glycaemia control in children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study of parents’ experiences and views. Diabetic Med. 2015;32:1063‐1070. - PubMed
    1. DiMeglio LA, Kanapka LG, DeSalvo DJ, et al. Time spent outside of target glucose range for young children with type 1 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitor study. Diabetic Med. 2020;37:1308‐1315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan‐Boylai S, Deatrick J, Gruppuso P, Tamborlane W, Grey M. Constant vigilance: mothers’ work parenting young children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18:21‐29. - PubMed

Publication types