Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;30(6):5269-5275.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06922-w. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

Patient perspectives on key symptoms and preferences for follow-up after upper gastro-intestinal cancer surgery

Affiliations

Patient perspectives on key symptoms and preferences for follow-up after upper gastro-intestinal cancer surgery

Philip H Pucher et al. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Long-lasting symptoms and reductions in quality of life are common after oesophago-gastric surgery. Post-operative follow-up has traditionally focussed on tumour recurrence and survival, but there is a growing need to also identify and treat functional sequelae to improve patients' recovery.

Methods: An electronic survey was circulated via a British national charity for patients undergoing oesophago-gastric surgery and their families. Patients were asked about post-operative symptoms they deemed important to their quality of life, as well as satisfaction and preferences for post-operative follow-up. Differences between satisfied and dissatisfied patients with reference to follow-up were assessed.

Results: Among 362 respondents with a median follow-up of 58 months since surgery (range 3-412), 36 different symptoms were reported as being important to recovery and quality of life after surgery, with a median of 13 symptoms per patient. Most (84%) respondents indicated satisfaction with follow-up. Satisfied patients were more likely to have received longer follow-up (5-year or longer follow-up 60% among satisfied patients vs 27% among unsatisfied, p < 0.001). These were also less likely to have seen a dietitian as part of routine follow-up (37% vs 58%, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This patient survey highlights preferences regarding follow-up after oesophago-gastrectomy. Longer follow-up and dietician involvement improved patient satisfaction. Patients reported being concerned by a large number of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary input and a consensus on how to manage the poly-symptomatic patient.

Keywords: Esophageal neoplasms; Esophagectomy; Gastrectomy; Gastric neoplasms; Survivorship; Symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Kauppila JH, Johar A, Lagergren P. Medical and surgical complications and health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271(3):502–508. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003097. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markar SR, Zaninotto G, Castoro C et al (2020) Lasting Symptoms After Esophageal Resection (LASER): European multicenter cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e392–e400. - PubMed
    1. Bouras G, Markar SR, Burns EM, et al. The psychological impact of symptoms related to esophagogastric cancer resection presenting in primary care: a national linked database study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(2):454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chew T, Bright T, Price TJ, et al. Follow-up practices of surgeons and medical oncologists in Australia and New Zealand following resection of esophagogastric cancers. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(5):217–222. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00049. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyes LH, Anderson JE, Forshaw MJ. Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2010;8:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-8-75. - DOI - PMC - PubMed