Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0264939.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264939. eCollection 2022.

Influence of pregnancy related anthropometric changes on plantar pressure distribution during gait-A follow-up study

Affiliations

Influence of pregnancy related anthropometric changes on plantar pressure distribution during gait-A follow-up study

Agata Masłoń et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: As foot constitutes the base of support for the whole body, the pregnancy-related anthropometric changes can result in adaptive plantar pressure alterations. The present study aimed to investigate how pregnancy affects foot loading pattern in gait, and if it is related to body adjustments to growing foetus that occur in the course of pregnancy.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal study included 30 women. Three experimental sessions in accordance with the same procedure were carried out in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy. First, the anthropometric measures of the body mass and waist circumference were taken. Then walking trials at a self-selected speed along a ~6-m walkway were registered with the FreeMED force platform (Sensor Medica, Italy). Vertical foot pressure was recorded by the force plate located in the middle of the walkway.

Findings: The correlation of individual foot loading parameters across different trimesters was relatively high. Nevertheless, our results revealed a longitudinal foot arch flattening with the strongest effect in late pregnancy (P = 0.01). The anthropometric characteristics also influenced the foot loading pattern depending on the phase of pregnancy. In particular, arch flattening correlated with the body mass in all trimesters (r≥0.44, P≤0.006) while the medial-lateral loading index correlated only in the first (r = 0.45, P = 0.005) and second (r = 0.36, P = 0.03) trimesters. Waist circumference changes significantly influenced dynamic arch flattening but only in the late pregnancy (r≥0.46, P≤0.004). In the third trimester, a small though significant increase in the right foot angle was observed (P = 0.01).

Interpretation: The findings provided the characteristics of the relative foot areas loading throughout pregnancy. Growing abdominal size increases the risk of medial arch flattening, which can result in less stable gait. The observed increase in foot angle in late pregnancy may constitute a strategy to enhance gait stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental setup and foot pressure distribution measurements.
A–the participants were asked to walk barefoot along a ~6-m walkway at comfortable self-selected speeds. Vertical foot pressure was recorded by the force plate (40x40 cm) located in the middle of the walkway. B–foot division into 9 regions (to evaluate the corresponding indicators of foot loading—DAI, FRI, MLI): medial (1) and lateral (2) heel; medial (3) and lateral (4) foot arch; first (5), second-third (6) and fourth-fifth (7) metatarsal bones heads; hallux (8) and lesser toes (9).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Foot loading characteristics in the 1st (P1), 2nd (P2) and 3rd (P3) trimesters of gestation.
A–dynamic arch index (mean±SD). B–foot angle (mean±SD). Upper colour footprints in A and B illustrate examples of averaged right foot pressure distribution patterns of individual subjects in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters of gestation.

References

    1. Lymbery JK, Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during late pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005; 95: 247–253. doi: 10.7547/0950247 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nyska M, Sofer D, Porat A, Howard CB, Levi A, Meizner I. Planter foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr J Med Sci. 1997; 33: 139–146. - PubMed
    1. Marnach ML, Ramin KD, Ramsey PS, Song SW, Stensland JJ, An KN. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 331–335. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02447-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Goldsmith L, Shenton D, Silva PD, Schaper A. Peripheral joint laxity increases in pregnancy but does not correlate with serum relaxin levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 667–671. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70447-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler EE, Colón I, Druzin ML, Rose J. Postural equilibrium during pregnancy: Decreased stability with an increased reliance on visual cues. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1104–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types