Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan 18;14(3):423.
doi: 10.3390/nu14030423.

The Impact of a High-Carbohydrate/Low Fat vs. Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Performance and Body Composition in Physically Active Adults: A Cross-Over Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Impact of a High-Carbohydrate/Low Fat vs. Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Performance and Body Composition in Physically Active Adults: A Cross-Over Controlled Trial

Nadine B Wachsmuth et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: Recently, high-carbohydrate or low-carbohydrate (HC/LC) diets have gained substantial popularity, speculated to improve physical performance in athletes; however, the effects of short-term changes of the aforementioned nutritional interventions remain largely unclear. Methods: The present study investigated the impact of a three-week period of HC/low-fat (HC) diet followed by a three-week wash-out-phase and subsequent LC diet on the parameters of physical capacity assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing, body composition via bioimpedance analysis and blood profiles, which were assessed after each of the respective diet periods. Twenty-four physically active adults (14 females, age 25.8 ± 3.7 years, body mass index 22.1 ± 2.2 kg/m2), of which six participants served as a control group, were enrolled in the study. Results: After three weeks of each diet, VO2peak was comparable following both interventions (46.8 ± 6.7 (HC) vs. 47.2 ± 6.7 mL/kg/min (LC; p = 0.58)) while a significantly higher peak performance (251 ± 43 W (HC) vs. 240 ± 45 W (LC); (p = 0.0001), longer time to exhaustion (14.5 ± 2.4 min (HC) vs. 14.1 ± 2.4 min (LC); p = 0.002) and greater Watt/kg performance (4.1 ± 0.5 W/kg (HC) vs. 3.9 ± 0.5 W/kg (LC); p = 0.003) was demonstrated after the HC diet. In both trial arms, a significant reduction in body mass (65.2 ± 11.2 to 63.8 ± 11.8 kg (HC) vs. 64.8 ± 11.6 to 63.5 ± 11.3 kg (LC); both p < 0.0001) and fat mass (22.7% to 21.2%; (HC) vs. 22.3% to 20.6% (LC); both p < 0.0001) but not in lean body mass or skeletal muscle mass was shown when compared to baseline. Resting metabolic rate was not different within both groups (p > 0.05). Total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol significantly decreased after the HC diet (97.9 ± 33.6 mg/dL at baseline to 78.2 ± 23.5 mg/dL; p = 0.02) while triglycerides significantly increased (76 ± 38 mg/dL at baseline to 104 ± 44 mg/dL; p = 0.005). Conclusion: A short-term HC and LC diet showed improvements in various performance parameters in favor of the HC diet. Some parameters of body composition significantly changed during both diets. The HC diet led to a significant reduction in total and LDL-cholesterol while triglycerides significantly increased.

Keywords: body composition; high-carb diet; low-carb diet; metabolism; physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not declare any conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study procedures.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Course over time for O2 consumption (A) and O2 efficiency (B) during cardio-pulmonary exercise testing. Ex = time point of exhaustion, HC = high-carb, LC = low-carb, * indicates p < 0.05 between HC and LC group, ** indicates p < 0.01 between HC and LC group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Course over time for heart rate (A), lactate (B) and glucose (C) during cardio-pulmonary exercise testing. * Indicates p < 0.05 between HC and control group, **** indicates p < 0.0001 between HC and control group. Control 1 and 2 indicate the respective 3-week episodes of the control group. † Indicates p < 0.05 between HC and LC. ‡ Indicates p = 0.05 between LC and control group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of macronutrients according to diet groups and control. CHO = carbohydrate.

References

    1. Phillips J.A. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. Workplace Health Saf. 2021;69:395. doi: 10.1177/21650799211026980. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spriet L.L. Performance Nutrition for Athletes. Sports Med. 2019;49:1–2. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1027-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huntriss R., Campbell M., Bedwell C. The interpretation and effect of a low-carbohydrate diet in the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;72:311–325. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0019-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. VanItallie T.B., Nufert T.H. Ketones: Metabolism’s ugly duckling. Nutr. Rev. 2003;61:327–341. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.oct.327-341. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adam-Perrot A., Clifton P., Brouns F. Low-carbohydrate diets: Nutritional and physiological aspects. Obes. Rev. 2006;7:49–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00222.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances